Re: Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr s
- From: "Paul Bergson" <pbergson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:36:36 -0500
Ok I found something. Look for print operators, you will notice this group
is only available on DC's.
http://www.ss64.com/ntsyntax/security_groups.html
--
Paul Bergson MCT, MCSE, MCSA, CNE, CNA, CCA
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"IT Guy" <ITGuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D94D3361-A265-45DF-84C5-70E3BB6BF5C2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do you have a link to additional info on lack of support for Print
> Operators
> under 2003 or configuring a print server...?
>
> "Paul Bergson" wrote:
>
>> We created two new print servers for our domain. We have a group of
>> support
>> specialists we wanted to provide the ability to manage documents. Since
>> under 2003 the default permission no longer provides print operators any
>> permissions on a print server, you have to manually add the permission.
>> We
>> had to go back and add this to 140+ printers. We also had add a second
>> print server to our domain.
>>
>> We chose to use a 2003 resource tool called setprinter.exe using the
>> level 3
>> option. This reset all permissions back to an initial set but we were
>> able
>> to provide manage documents.
>>
>> I can post my notes on this if you are looking for this info.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Paul Bergson MCT, MCSE, MCSA, CNE, CNA, CCA
>>
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>>
>>
>> "IT Guy" <ITGuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:EF2E2A17-FD2A-4DD9-9174-9EB3BBB64739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >I may have not made my problem clear or I'm misunderstanding your
>> >suggestion...
>> >
>> > Just to clarify, I've added a user to the builtin domain print
>> > operators
>> > group and that user is unable to administer printers within the domain
>> > (not
>> > printers attached to a dc).
>> >
>> > More over, if the user opens the properties window within a printer,
>> > the
>> > options (sharing, ports, color management, security, etc.) are read
>> > only.
>> > Because the user is a member of the print operators group, I would
>> > think
>> > the
>> > user would have full control.
>> >
>> > FWIW, I did try your suggestion and added the user to the server
>> > operators
>> > group. The user still only had read permissions to printer
>> > properties...
>> > :(
>> >
>> >
>> > "Don Wilwol" wrote:
>> >
>> >> That's the way it is. Printer Operators manage DC's. You need to add
>> >> the
>> >> users to the Server Operators group.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Hope it helps
>> >>
>> >> dw
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________
>> >> Don Wilwol
>> >> donwilwol(DELETE)@yahoo.com
>> >> http://spaces.msn.com/members/wilwol/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "IT Guy" <ITGuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:B8ABFCB2-8F52-45AD-8872-98890167ED65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > We have a problem that's been nagging us for a few weeks now. A
>> >> > domain
>> >> > user
>> >> > has been assigned to the print operators group to administer
>> >> > printers
>> >> > for
>> >> > our
>> >> > domain. Unfortunately, the user can read but not modify printer
>> >> > properties.
>> >> >
>> >> > I discovered while reviewing effective permissions on individual
>> >> > printer
>> >> > objects that the user has read only privileges when viewed from
>> >> > either
>> >> > my
>> >> > local workstation ADUC or a member server ADUC but full control when
>> >> > viewed
>> >> > from ADUC on any of our DCs. The Print Operators group has full
>> >> > control
>> >> > under effective permissions when viewed either way.
>> >> >
>> >> > We are running a Windows 2003 domain with 3 domain controllers. I
>> >> > have
>> >> > run
>> >> > gpupdate /force but still see the conflicting effective permissions.
>> >> > I
>> >> > am
>> >> > able to add objects, modify permissions, etc. from both DC and
>> >> > non-DC
>> >> > ADUCs
>> >> > and have those changes replicate successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > Presumably the TRUELY effective permissions are the ones that I am
>> >> > seeing
>> >> > from non-DC ADUCs because the user is not able to modify printers.
>> >> > Any
>> >> > ideas
>> >> > why the user's effective permissions would be different depending on
>> >> > where
>> >> > I
>> >> > view them from? Any ideas on why the effective permissions being
>> >> > shown
>> >> > on
>> >> > DC
>> >> > ADUCs are not working? Thanks!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
.
- References:
- Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr svr A
- From: IT Guy
- Re: Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr svr A
- From: Don Wilwol
- Re: Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr s
- From: IT Guy
- Re: Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr s
- From: Paul Bergson
- Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr svr A
- Prev by Date: Re: AD user still receives emails sent to DL which she has been removed from
- Next by Date: LDF file to modify the attributes
- Previous by thread: Re: Conflicting effective permissions (DC ADUC & workstation/mbr s
- Next by thread: Lock an inactive account with GPO
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|