Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: "Don Wilwol" <donWilwol@(EMAIL)yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:18:39 -0400
I've got to agree with Ulf here. Layer 2 routing over wireless? Its going
out of your way to make it wrong.
You've got to have some type of device at each location. Make it a router,
on separate subnets and be done with it.
Either one of these is going to take some technical expertise. You can ether
learn it, or hire a local consultant. The price tag shouldn't be that big
compared to the wireless implementation.
--
Hope it helps
dw
_______________________________
Don Wilwol
donwilwol(DELETE)@yahoo.com
http://spaces.msn.com/members/wilwol/
"Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [MVP]" <nospam2-ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:Ow21g59qFHA.3060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:GFjQe.19234$KX7.1798@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> clearly the guy wont understand what you just told him.
>>
>> Medo... if you want to keep them all on the same subnet (192.168.1.x -
>> 255.255.255.0), you can. just make sure that you dont have duplicate ip
>> addresses (same address on both sides). also you will only be able to
>> have 254 hosts on the network. a better way would be to either use a
>> bigger subnet (255.255.0.0) or 2 different subnets (one on each side-
>> 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x both with 24-bit masks (255.255.255.0)
>>
>
> If he does that he needs to make sure that he's using layer2 routing, and
> he'll have a broadcast-domain across a WAN, and no site-aware applications
> which he might introduce later (as a DC for each domain in the other
> location). And since it's unlikely that two separate networks using the
> same subnet didn't use the same IPs he needs to change them anyways. I'd
> still recommend having a separate subnet by changing it in one of the
> locations.
>
> To clarify TCP/IP-Adressing there's a good guide available at 3com:
> http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
>
> --
> Gruesse - Sincerely,
>
> Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
>
> MVP-Book "Windows XP - Die Expertentipps": http://tinyurl.com/44zcz
> Weblog: http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
> Website: http://www.windowsserverfaq.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: Medo_in_Egypt
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- References:
- TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: Medo_in_Egypt
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [MVP]
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: Medo_in_Egypt
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [MVP]
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: no
- Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- From: Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [MVP]
- TCP/IP Urgent help
- Prev by Date: Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- Next by Date: Re: Domain conroller does not show active directory
- Previous by thread: Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- Next by thread: Re: TCP/IP Urgent help
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|