Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: "Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\)" <joseph.e.kaplan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:06:38 -0500
There are other things you might want to consider too. For example, if your
needs for a directory are primarily authorization-related (need application
specific groups and such), you might want to consider using AzMan as the
core of your authorization architecture.
AzMan supports Windows, ADAM and "custom" security principals and gives you
a lot of flexibility there.
Another aspect of this would be to support some kind of a plugin framework
for authentication, where you might ship some default providers (ADAM LDAP
bind, using the existing Windows user's security context, LDAP bind to AD,
SSPI to AD/Windows, LDAP bind to other directory, etc.), with the ability to
allow the customers and third parties to add their own authentication
providers. That way, if you end up needing to support something like smart
cards or RSA SecurID tokens or something, a plugin approach could be used.
Once the user is authenticated, then the user's authenticated identity would
be used to link up to the authorization store.
Another thing to consider is the federated model I talked about in my other
post with ADFS and similar technologies (SAML, etc.). Getting up to speed
on that stuff will probably help you make better design decisions about how
to proceed.
Best of luck,
Joe K.
"Rob Lewis" <roblewis5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123270284.401018.89860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks Joe! That's exactly what I needed to know.
>
> As far as account/password sync goes: I agree - not a good solution.
> Especially since it would need to be a custom job for each different
> store / authentication scheme.
>
> That leaves me in a bit of a bind though (no pun intended). If not
> ADAM, then what? :-(
>
> I suppose another way to go would be to go ahead with ADAM, but if the
> customer's identity store is a non-MS directory, then they will have to
> get the accounts into ADAM and live with multiple identity stores and
> all that that involves...that scenario is far better than what we have
> now. And I'm guessing that the majority of our customers use AD.
>
> Thanks for all the advice!
>
> - Rob
>
.
- References:
- ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Rob Lewis
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Rob Lewis
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Rob Lewis
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Rob Lewis
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\)
- Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- From: Rob Lewis
- ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- Prev by Date: RE: Active Directory Data Extraction
- Next by Date: RE: Active Directory Data Extraction
- Previous by thread: Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- Next by thread: Re: ADAM - SSO and provisioning considerations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|