Re: global local security group question
- From: "Chriss3 [MVP]" <noSpamHere@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:21:43 +0200
Hello,
Sounds like you have a very good way of doing this, I suggest that going
with the global groups is fine.
--
Regards
Christoffer Andersson
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
No email replies please - reply in the newsgroup
------------------------------------------------
http://www.chrisse.se - Active Directory Tips
"Mike Brearley" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:eFCU8M4PFHA.1172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What's the proper way to setup security for a shared data directory?
>
> Say I have the following directories:
>
> Accounting
> Engineering
> Human Resources
> Manufacturing
> Marketing
> Purchasing
> Shared
>
> In AD, there are global groups, i.e. Accounting_Read, Accounting_Full,
> All_Users, Engineering_Read, etc . . . which the appropriate user accounts
> are members of. Now, should I create local groups in AD and assign the
> global group as a member of the local group and then assign the local
> group access to the directories on the file server? Or should I leave out
> the local groups and just assign the global groups permissions to the
> directories? Or should I create groups on the file server itself and
> assign the global groups as members of the file server level groups and
> assign the file server level groups access to the directories?
>
> I know it works any way I do it, but what is the proper (Microsoft) way of
> doing it?
>
> --
> Posted 'as is'. If there are any spelling and/or grammar mistakes, they
> were a direct result of my fingers and brain not being synchronized or my
> lack of caffeine.
>
> Mike Brearley
>
>
.
- References:
- global local security group question
- From: Mike Brearley
- global local security group question
- Prev by Date: Re: AD
- Next by Date: Add Shortcut Icon to user's Desktop
- Previous by thread: global local security group question
- Next by thread: Re: global local security group question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|