Re: How to ... 2nd request

From: JJ Runnion (johnjayR_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/17/04


Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:57:08 -0500

thanx, Paul & Glenn -- i appreciate the feedback.

jj

-- 
JJ Runnion
"Paul Mckenna" <Paul@removeme.arkel.co.uk> wrote in message news:ebfxOJ9sEHA.2596@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> I appreciate your clarification and views on my answer Glenn. :)
> 
> I wasn't actually aware these kind of restrictions could be placed at the OU 
> level..
> I just assumed that any computer with these settings via an OU GPO would 
> just apply to user accounts setup locally on the PC. (I blame it on just 
> taking the 070-294 exam where there is a strong emphases on where you can 
> setup up GPOs to affect password policies)
> 
> Thanks again
> Regards
> Paul Mckenna
> 
> 
> "Glenn LeCheminant" <the.only@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:O1b9SN2sEHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > It was painful reading your security requirements.
> > I had to read it twice to understand what you are after.
> > There are only 3 ways (that I know of) to restrict what workstations users
> > and groups may log into.
> > Paul basically layed it out in his post.
> >
> > Of the 3 options,
> > user properties
> > sec templates for each workstation category,
> > OUs and GPOs,
> > I favor OUs and GPOs.  Yes it will look ugly and complex to get what you
> > want.  But you will get what you want provided you set it up properly. And
> > it will be setup for any other desktop managment that may follow.
> >
> > There are two policies you can set to acheive the desired results.
> > "Allow logon locally" you could set this up to be inclusive of all groups
> > that need interactive logon.  Don't forget to include administrators and
> > help desk staff.
> > Keep in mind applying this policy will overwrite the defaults on the
> > workstation (so you must include 'administrators' in the policy).  Also, 
> > the
> > workstations reads these users and groups as local unless they are 
> > prefaced
> > by domainname\group name.
> > And yet another caveat to policies under the security node.  They are
> > lingering policies (tattooing).  If you unlink it or remove it from the 
> > OU,
> > the workstations will not revert back to their default state.
> >
> > "Deny logon locally" If you use this one, be sure to include guest 
> > (default)
> > so you don't open up a security hole.
> >
> > You should not see a performance hit for the workstations on far side of
> > slow WAN.  It only takes a few milisecs for the workstation to identify
> > where it is and what policies it must apply.
> > the more policies to apply the longer it takes.
> >
> > So, move forward, create those OUs and GPOs and get it over with.
> >
> > Glenn
> >
> > "Paul Mckenna" <Paul@removeme.arkel.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:%23MKz7ZrsEHA.2960@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if this is what you want.
> >> But in each OU if select all the users, right click, select properties
> > click
> >> account tab you can then select which computers they are allowed to log 
> >> in
> >> to.
> >> Clearly this is going to be a pain setting it up initially but after that
> >> you can create a template for future users you need to setup.
> >>
> >> Other than that I suppose you could create a security template for each
> > set
> >> of computers and apply it to them.. I'm not too sure if you have the
> > option
> >> to select which users can log in though , I thought it was just who can
> > log
> >> in locally.. But I could be wrong. :)
> >>
> >>
> >> "JJ Runnion" <jjrNOSPAM@sinte.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:e$wCNNrsEHA.2780@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> >I wonder if i didn't clearly explain the problem last post, so I'm going
> > to
> >> >try again.  We are looking for the best way to restrict logons to 
> >> >various
> >> >workstations to specific security groups on our domain.
> >> >
> >> > We have several academic and administrative departments and our OU
> >> > structure basically follows that.  However, we also have student labs 
> >> > in
> >> > many of those OUs, interns, and public access in the library.  We need
> > to
> >> > restrict logon to computers to only those members of the OUs that 
> >> > should
> >> > have access to particular machines.  I.E.: financial aid computers for
> >> > only their personnel (staff), open area library computers for public
> >> > access, lab computers for faculty and students, academic depts. for 
> >> > only
> >> > those department staff, faculty, interns, etc. One complicating factor
> > is
> >> > that in a given department (OU), there may be one or two machines that
> >> > students must have access to, others that only Faculty should, and yet
> >> > others that only staff should.  In addition, some of the outlying
> >> > departments have much slower connections than others (and so, I have a
> >> > certain reluctance to create tiered OUs with multiple GPOs), and some
> >> > still use win2000 Pro.
> >> >
> >> > It has been suggested that we have to use GPOs on the OUs for the
> > machines
> >> > and set specific groups to deny (as opposed to allow).  Which would 
> >> > mean
> >> > we will need to break down the OUs into sub OUs for the labs, the 
> >> > intern
> >> > computers (and sometimes there's only one in an OU that is for 
> >> > interns),
> >> > etc., etc.  This doesn't seem like a very elegant way to do this, so 
> >> > I'm
> >> > hoping one of you experts can help me if there is a better way, or to
> > send
> >> > me to a resource that can delineate one.
> >> >
> >> > Your input, advice, and recommendations are appreciated!
> >> >
> >> > thanx,
> >> >
> >> > jj
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -- 
> >> > jj runnion
> >> > jjrNOSPAM@sinte.edu
> >> > (remove NOSPAM to send email to this address)
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> > 
> 
> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to ... 2nd request
    ... > I appreciate your clarification and views on my answer Glenn. ... >> OUs and GPOs, ... >> There are two policies you can set to acheive the desired results. ... >> the workstations will not revert back to their default state. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: How to ... 2nd request
    ... > OUs and GPOs, ... > There are two policies you can set to acheive the desired results. ... > And yet another caveat to policies under the security node. ... > the workstations will not revert back to their default state. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: How to ... 2nd request
    ... > OUs and GPOs, ... > There are two policies you can set to acheive the desired results. ... > And yet another caveat to policies under the security node. ... > the workstations will not revert back to their default state. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: _Group Policy only 1 of 6 is working
    ... Additional: This AM GPUpdate is now showing the 5 GPOs as "filtering: ... I'm really beginning to dislike group policies. ... >Account Policies / Password Policy ... >Computer Configuration. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy)
  • Re: _Group Policy only 1 of 6 is working
    ... Do you have ANY block policy inheritance on the OUs? ... GPOs are empty... ... I am a domain admin and these policies are not working for me ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy)