Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration
From: James Williams (itenginerd_at_nospam.earthlink.nospam.net)
Date: 03/25/04
- Next message: Scott Lowe: "Re: AD/DNS infrastructure (long)"
- Previous message: Mike Doyle: "ADAM install hangs at Starting ADAM service..."
- In reply to: Chriss3: "Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration"
- Next in thread: Chriss3: "Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration"
- Reply: Chriss3: "Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:23:52 -0500
Just for clarification--is it *possible* for an exchange org to span
over forests? I was told recently by an MCT in a bootcamp that it was
possible to do, if you set up a two-way external trust.
If anybody knows *for sure*, I'd appreciate comments. Thx!
Chriss3 wrote:
> Brain the best is to go into a single forest scenario because an Exchange
> Organization can't span over multiple forests. a single Exchange
> Organization provides a Global Address Catalog and make the administration
> much more easy.
>
> You can still store Chicago Users Mailboxes at the Exchange Server there and
> London Mailboxes at the Exchange Server in London. You may want both
> available to send mail and London to receive.
>
> A good reference for doing a such migration is Falcon Consultancy
> http://www.falcon-consultancy.co.uk
>
> Regards
> Christoffer Andersson
- Next message: Scott Lowe: "Re: AD/DNS infrastructure (long)"
- Previous message: Mike Doyle: "ADAM install hangs at Starting ADAM service..."
- In reply to: Chriss3: "Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration"
- Next in thread: Chriss3: "Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration"
- Reply: Chriss3: "Re: Company purchase - AD & Exchange Integration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|