Re: ADAM bindable object question
From: Bob Durie (bobdurie_at_canada.com)
Date: 03/19/04
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Active Directory and Win98 and NT 4.0 clients"
- Previous message: Jim P.: "Re: 2003 AD Replication Problem between Sites"
- In reply to: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Next in thread: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Reply: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Reply: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Mar 2004 10:50:55 -0800
Thanks again - one final question. I've gotten all the schema set up,
but I can't do simple binds to my ADAM - no matter what i use (be it a
user, inetOrgPerson, bindableObject, or DN from my real AD domain
admin) i get "invalid credentials". Is there a setting to enable
simple binds, or something I might be missing here? Note I'm not
using encryption, and occasionally 3rd party ldap clients, but even
from ldp it doesn't work.
Thanks,
Bob
"Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]" <dmitrig@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<#K2EADVDEHA.3236@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>...
> Inline...
>
> --
> Dmitri Gavrilov
> SDE, Active Directory Core
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> "Bob Durie" <bobdurie@canada.com> wrote in message
> news:b4ec8b59.0403181521.4f4b452c@posting.google.com...
> > Thanks for the reply, that actually makes a lot of sense. I guess I
> > can do that with ldif scripts, using the systemAuxiliaryClass
> > attribute - i don't think i can change this attribute value at
> > creation time with the ADAM schema snapin... please correct if I'm
> > wrong.
> You can use either systemAuxiliaryClass or auxiliaryClass -- either one will
> work.
>
> >
> > As for the non-comformant schema, LDAP modify operations with multiple
> > attribute changes would typically solve this problem. That's what I'm
> > trying to do, and have done in the past when an auxiliary object class
> > has mandatory attributes for other directory products... sample ldif
> > below:
> >
> > dn: OU=wannabind,O=corp,C=ca
> > changetype: modify
> > add: objectClass
> > objectClass: msDS-bindProxy
> > add: objectSid
> > objectSid:: AQUAAWAAAAUVAAAAaHCdCs9LDWSdu0M89AEAAA==
>
> The problem with this is that we generally don't allow writing or changing
> SIDs. We made an exception for bindProxy objects -- the SID can only be
> specified on creation. Otherwise, SIDs are immutable. It would be a security
> issue otherwise (audits, ACLs etc are all keyed on the SID). For user
> objects, the SID is auto-created on object creation.
>
> >
> > But obviously this doesn't work. I was very happy to hear AD for w2k3
> > (and ADAM) allowed for dynamically adding object classes to entries -
> > it would be nice if the above worked too, but oh well (mabye for the
> > next AD :).
> >
> > One more followup question - is there any way (for instance, using the
> > userPassword or unicodePwd attributes) to make an existing object
> > bindable if it's structural objectclass doesn't allow for it (either
> > through optional attributes, or static auxiliary classes as you've
> > described)? Basically, for an existing entry of *arbitrary* object
> > class, can it's DN be used to authenticate to the directory? This
> > would typically be done in X.500 by adding the 'simpleAuthObject'
> > auxiliary object class to the entry, and then assignment of the
> > userPassword attribute... it seems for ADAM the answer is no, but I
> > just want to be sure.
>
> No, no way. The reason is the SID. Bindable objects need SIDs, and we only
> stamp the SID on creation.
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > "Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]" <dmitrig@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:<#aIR2OSDEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
> > > You can not add msDS-bindableObject or msDS-bindProxy to an existing
> object.
> > > You have to add them to a class definition in the schema, which will
> make
> > > all objects of this class behave the same way. Moreover, you must add
> them
> > > at the time when you create your class -- you will not be able to update
> it
> > > later on. This is because adding the aux class adds a new mustContain
> > > (objectSid), and this is not allowed for existing classes. The reason
> for
> > > not allowing this is you could have existing objects of this class, and
> this
> > > addition would make them invalid (non schema-conformant).
> > >
> > > Bottom line -- include msDS-bindableObject or msDS-bindProxy aux class
> to
> > > your class definition, at creation time.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dmitri Gavrilov
> > > SDE, Active Directory Core
> > >
> > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> > > Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
> > >
> > > "Bob Durie" <bobdurie@canada.com> wrote in message
> > > news:b4ec8b59.0403181030.df9e439@posting.google.com...
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having difficulty create security principals (or proxies) out of
> > > > arbitrary entries in ADAM. My goal is to a have a plain old entry
> > > > (non-user), add either the msDS-bindableObject or msDS-bindProxy
> > > > objectClass, and allow that entry to authenticate. I've read some
> > > > similar posts on here about this, but no one has my specific problem.
> > > >
> > > > The problem I'm seeing is when i try to add these object classes
> > > > (using either ldifde or ldp), i have issues with the objectSid
> > > > attribute. In the case of adding msDS-bindableObject to an entry,
> > > > objectSid is a required attribute and I don't know how to construct
> > > > one! Hence, i get the "A required attribute is missing" error. When
> > > > I try to add msDS-bindProxy and use an existing SID from a real AD (or
> > > > ADAM) user, I get this:
> > > >
> > > > Add error on line 1: Unwilling To Perform
> > > > The server side error is: 0x20e7 The modification was not permitted
> > > > for security
> > > > reasons.
> > > > The extended server error is:
> > > > 000020E7: SvcErr: DSID-03152972, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data
> > > > 8358
> > > >
> > > > I've seen posts that allude to the possibility you cannot dynamically
> > > > extend an existing entry with these objectclass's, it must be a
> > > > statically linked auxiliary class - but when i try to make a
> > > > structural object class have a static auxiliary linking to on of the
> > > > msDS-bind* object classes I get "The change was rejected by the
> > > > directory service." error. Help!! I know there's some MS folk out
> > > > there that have just the answer's i'm looking for, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Bob Durie
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Active Directory and Win98 and NT 4.0 clients"
- Previous message: Jim P.: "Re: 2003 AD Replication Problem between Sites"
- In reply to: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Next in thread: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Reply: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Reply: Dmitri Gavrilov [MSFT]: "Re: ADAM bindable object question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|