Re: Need Configuration Help

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: Ed_from_Baruch (EdfromBaruch_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/21/04 

Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:23:05 -0800

Wow, thanks for all your help with this. I be sure to look out for these new
cards. Thanks again.

"JW" wrote:

> I have no solutions to propose. From the Web I found that your IBM/SONY CRT
> monitor was designed and sold for high resolution PC graphics such as
> medical images etc. and it appears that it acts much like a native
> resolution digital display with a normal resolution of 1920x1440.(The
> lowest resolution listed as being used was 1600x1200@85Hz) . Since the MCE
> video is stored at 720x480(345K pixels) and your display wants at
> least1600x1200(1.9Mega pixels) 5.5 pixels of data have to be "invented" for
> every pixel of real input data either by the monitors driver or by the
> monitor itself. It is apparently this upscaling of the images that is
> causing it to be blurry.
> NVIDIA yesterday announce improved video for their 6000 series cards called
> "Pure Video" which might be able to provide better upscaling to 1600x1200
> however, there are no user reports yet of how good it is. I saw one post
> that ATI is also working on a similar capability but I know nothing about
> it.
>
>
> "Ed_from_Baruch" <EdfromBaruch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:BF073829-567E-482B-8871-DACD318DF0B2@microsoft.com...
> >I have a 21" IBM P260 and it is a CRT. By blurry, I mean it doesn't look
> > sharp. It looks like the special effect when people are dreaming on tv.
> >
> > "JW" wrote:
> >
> >> What kind of monitor do you have?
> >> Have you tried connecting your IBM monitor instead, assuming it has a VGA
> >> port? What kind of monitor is it?
> >> If either of the monitors are LCD monitors what are their native
> >> resolutions
> >> and response times?
> >> Can you describe a little better what you mean by "blurry"? Is it related
> >> to
> >> moving objects or all objects?
> >> Did lowering the resolution help at all?
> >>
> >> "Ed_from_Baruch" <Ed_from_Baruch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> >> message
> >> news:EC81081B-0792-4D2D-94AA-AAC00B62CEB9@microsoft.com...
> >> > Thanks for the reply, is there anything else that I could do to improve
> >> > my
> >> > picture video?
> >> >
> >> > "JW" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Additional video memory or a DVI connection will not help. since your
> >> >> monitor is using DVI-A.
> >> >> Since the TV video has been captured at 720x480 Setting your
> >> >> resolution
> >> >> to
> >> >> 800x600 should help if it is currently set higher than that. You could
> >> >> even
> >> >> bring in down to 640x480 but then your desktop functions would be
> >> >> harder
> >> >> to
> >> >> use.
> >> >>
> >> >> "Ed_from_Baruch" <Ed_from_Baruch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> >> >> message
> >> >> news:DF12A5E8-D0F6-4E1A-A175-D4C67EE30F66@microsoft.com...
> >> >> > Hello all:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I don't know if these question are going to sound stupid, but I'll
> >> >> > ask
> >> >> > them
> >> >> > anyway. First I wanted to know if it was better to have the
> >> >> > resolution
> >> >> > set
> >> >> > lower when I watch tv. Second, I curently watch tv on my PC
> >> >> > monitor.
> >> >> > The
> >> >> > picture is ok, but it looks a little blurry. I have a ATI Radeon
> >> >> > X300
> >> >> > @
> >> >> > 128mb with a turner in another AGP port. (They both came with my HP
> >> >> > 1080
> >> >> > media center. Should I update my card to 256mb. Also I have a 21"
> >> >> > IBM
> >> >> > monitor that has a DVI-A port, but my video card doesn't. If I get
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > card
> >> >> > with DVI, will that improve my viewing experience. Any information
> >> >> > about
> >> >> > this would be greatly appreciated.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IIgs RGB to VGA experiment
    ... So you advocate a small monitor only to ... translate 70ns to displayable monitor pixels in 39+ microseconds, ... a display listed as "1080i" would have a pixel resolution of only 1366x768, which is clearly far less than the 1920x1080 that one might ... The second motive is to make sure that high resolution digital video ...
    (comp.sys.apple2)
  • Re: Multi monitors in OS X
    ... exactly the same image and they must be the same number of pixels. ... screens, will then display very different numbers of pixels. ... If the resolution chosen by the user happens to be the native one ... If the monitor is able to support scaling an image at a different ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: screen resolution
    ... Check the spec on the monitor, I would guess that 1440 x 900 is out of ... After installing display ... usually best to keep the resolution at the native resolution of the ... Screen res determines how many pixels of information are displayed ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
  • Re: XP
    ... Still finding my way around it and installing prog's I had before ... matter - with it Set to a low Resolution, such as 800 x 600, then you ... But an LCD Monitor has what is called a "Native" Resolution ... That's the number of actual Pixels on the Display (Horizontally ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)
  • Re: XP
    ... Still finding my way around it and installing prog's I had before ... matter - with it Set to a low Resolution, such as 800 x 600, then you ... But an LCD Monitor has what is called a "Native" Resolution ... That's the number of actual Pixels on the Display (Horizontally ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)