RE: why so slow? Programming or network configuration?SAME
From: mt2 (mt2_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/13/04
- Next message: kalev-: "Re: DVR-MS files and Media Player 10"
- Previous message: mt2: "RE: Tuner for Windows XP Media Center 2005"
- In reply to: Joe Gannon: "why so slow? Programming or network configuration?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 06:45:18 -0800
Same problem here.
"Joe Gannon" wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I recently have read in the press some complaints about how the MCE
> extenders dont work very well -- e.g. they are prone to freezing up on a
> wireless network. Microsoft seems to be very clear that the BEST extender
> configuration is wired. Seems to me that if you tweek it, then you have a
> betetr chance of making it work correctly. I also read Barb's excellent
> column on how to make the wireless config work better. But here is my
> question more for a programmer or network engineer. It seems that some
> critics tend to blame the MCE itself for freezups and not able to pass along
> data. I certainly understand that network traffic can be clogged due to high
> bandwidth that makes it more prone to a slowdown escpecially on a wireless
> network. But how much of that "slowdown" may also be due to the way the
> operating system code is written? That is, can code be written in an
> operating system to make the slowdowns less likely in a wireless network? Is
> it more likely that an upcoming MCE version would make it work better. I
> think critics who expect an MCE to deliver error free data without
> considering the high bandwidth and wireless constraints dont really
> understand how a network works, and shouldnt be as critical as they tend to be
>
> Joe
>
> Joe
- Next message: kalev-: "Re: DVR-MS files and Media Player 10"
- Previous message: mt2: "RE: Tuner for Windows XP Media Center 2005"
- In reply to: Joe Gannon: "why so slow? Programming or network configuration?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
