Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005
From: Jack (Jack_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "codecs"
- Previous message: Song Su: "Re: mce 2002 sp2 would not open link"
- In reply to: Jeff: "Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005"
- Next in thread: Jeff: "Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005"
- Reply: Jeff: "Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:11:24 -0800
you could choose to shop at HP instead of Gateway...
"Jeff" wrote:
> see inline
>
> "Lonewolf" wrote:
>
> > My two cent's worth:
> >
> > First, I don't think MS should be muscling resellers to do anything, they've
> > already been spanked for that.
> I am not asking MS to bully OEMs, I am asking them to make the MCE OS
> available retail just like WIN XP is.......I am asking the to stop the
> monopoly that OEMs have on MCE
> >
> > Second, Gateway has the right to make support decisions based not only on
> > what's good for their customers, but what's good for their business. They
> > alone are responsible for their decisions and if it gains or loses customers
> > for them, they can cheer or cry about it.
> You are right, it is Gateway's choice, However due to the MSFT OEM only
> model, I can't take my business elsewhere, Gateway is the ONLY place I can
> get my upgrade. this is the issue
> > Third, If you upgrade and have problems, who's at fault? Not MS, not
> > Gateway, so it must be that other company, right? Surely it won't be your
> > fault for not listening to the stake holders opinions.
> It is no different than if I walk into CompUSA and buy Win Xp pro and try to
> put it on a 66Mhz 386.........It is my fault. I do not understand how they
> can sell XP RO retail, yet say MCE is soooo different....the concept is the
> same....If i buy software and don't follow min specs, it is at my risk. This
> philosophy works for all their other OS/software, why not MCE.
> > Fourth, As consumers we've accepted this type of treatment in all areas so
> > who's really to blame? If this was an issue people were concerned about
> > they'd hold their $$$ until they're presented with something acceptable, so
> > shame on us
> Once again, I'd love to take my business elsewhere, the problem is I can't
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
- Next message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "codecs"
- Previous message: Song Su: "Re: mce 2002 sp2 would not open link"
- In reply to: Jeff: "Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005"
- Next in thread: Jeff: "Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005"
- Reply: Jeff: "Re: Gateway Upgrade Policy for MCE 2005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|