Satellite vs Cable
From: Joe Horton (horj235)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: JP: "Re: WMC 2005, Misleading installation instruction"
- Previous message: Chris H.: "Re: WMC 2005, Misleading installation instruction"
- Next in thread: JW: "Re: Satellite vs Cable"
- Reply: JW: "Re: Satellite vs Cable"
- Reply: Jason Hoekstra: "Re: Satellite vs Cable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:21:39 -0800
I have been a DirecTV customer for years using Tivo.
I just got a Samsung DLP 45 inch for the bedroom - and in order to get HD-Tivo - I have to spend $999 for equipment.
I was thinking of switching to ComCast for my TV - I only use it for Internet right now - but have noted my neighbors quality on Cable is nothing like my Satellite quality.
Is the point my neighbors aren't using HD and therefore aren't really using a digital signal? So my switching to ComCast it appears I can get a HD STB for about $300.
To get HD for my DirecTV without it being Tivo is $600 ($299 x 2 STB receivers) needed by WMC for dual tuners.
I guess here is my cost analysis for both systems - is this really what I have to spend to get HD and maintain my DVR system?:
Tivo route
$999 -Get HD for existing Tivo
DirecTV and WMC
$600 - Get 2 HD DirecTV receivers
$1000 + - New comptuer with Media Center 2005
$200 + Extendor
======
~$1800
Cable
$300 - HD STB
$1000 + - New comptuer with Media Center 2005
$200 + Extendor
=====
~$1500
- Next message: JP: "Re: WMC 2005, Misleading installation instruction"
- Previous message: Chris H.: "Re: WMC 2005, Misleading installation instruction"
- Next in thread: JW: "Re: Satellite vs Cable"
- Reply: JW: "Re: Satellite vs Cable"
- Reply: Jason Hoekstra: "Re: Satellite vs Cable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|