>There's a lot of complaining about OE, esp. from Mozilla fans. One area of complains is the security (or lack of it).
>
>I have used OE for many years. A number of times I have installed some other mail client, e.g. Thunderbird, and always with the same result - I uninstall it and go back to OE, since I think OE actually is better - faster and more intuitive.
>
>So my questions are:
> Is OE really that bad?
> Is security an issue in OE, compared to e.g. Thunderbird?
I have used the paid version of Eudora for a number of years, I tried
OE just 3 months ago - and did a permanent switch. No complaints with
the product so far.
Re: Anthonys drive issues.Re: ssh password delay ... then stop complaining to a list of 'kiddies', ... > Not Windows NT and its successors. ... > Many features of OS X seem oddly to match many of the features ... > Current Windows systems have a much stronger security model than UNIX; ... (freebsd-questions)
Re: Is OE really that bad? ... There's a lot of complaining about OE, ... from Mozilla fans.... Is security an issue in OE, compared to e.g. Thunderbird?... (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
Re: Is OE really that bad? ... > There's a lot of complaining about OE, ... One area of complains is the security. ... consternation because I was reading the same page of her newspaper as she ... while posting back through another server with 40tude. ... (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
[Full-disclosure] [Off-topic] Show some respect ...usefull, and that there are some intelligent people around. ... than complaining about all these knit-picking stuff. ... and discuss security matters and full-disclosing *security* problems, ... (Full-Disclosure)
Re: Is OE really that bad? ... > There's a lot of complaining about OE, ... from Mozilla fans.... > of complains is the security. ... > other mail client, e.g. Thunderbird, and always with the same result - ... (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
