Re: Email returned 'deleted'

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Michael

How do I get 'full headers' is that different to the 'message source'
details I posted?

Thanks

Bill



"Michael Santovec" <michael_santovec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OiJBKqDSFHA.2356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: It would help to see the full headers of the returned message. From that
we may be able
: to tell where the message is coming from.
:
: --
:
: Mike - http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm
:
:
: "Oziebill" <oziebill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: news:u8WR0$6RFHA.1564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > Michael
: >
: > Yes I do use Read receipts but this message is different::
: >
: > To: xxx (MP)
: > Subject: xxxx
: > Sent: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:45:51 +1000
: >
: > was deleted without being read on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:49:44 +1000
: >
: > There were no attachments, message was to another with the MP being a
cc.
: > Can't really see this being treated as spam, especially as I have had
other
: > messages to MP returned. The recipient is not using OE - being .gov they
: > probably have their own system. Appreciate anything you can glean from
the
: > following message source:
: >
: > Return-Path: <xxMP@xxxxxxxxxx>
: > Received: from smtp1.dmz.net ([202.14.81.8]) by imta02sl.mx.bigpond.com
: > with ESMTP
: > id
<20050421064946.HMXH17375.imta02sl.mx.myisp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: > for <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:49:46 +0000
: > Received: from emailconn1.parl.net ([10.4.185.56]) by smtp1.aph.gov.au
with
: > InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:49:45 +1000
: > Received: from email4.parl.net ([10.3.185.61]) by emailconn1.parl.net
with
: > Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
: > Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:49:45 +1000
: > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
: > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:mdn
: > MIME-Version: 1.0
: > Content-Type: multipart/report;
: > report-type=disposition-notification;
: > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5463E.4D39888C"
: > Subject: Not read: xxxx
: > Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:49:44 +1000
: > Message-ID: <6BAEAB01E81E5D4BB5CF312382FB32B3B8243B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: > X-MS-Has-Attach:
: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
: > Thread-Topic: xxx
: > Thread-Index: AcVGAxZRBV7hMknHRriA77MGKqG6UwAOzboc
: > From: "xx \(MP\)" <xx.MP@xxxxxxxxxx>
: > To: "Me" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
: > Return-Path: xx.MP@xxxxxxxxxx
: > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2005 06:49:45.0324 (UTC)
: > FILETIME=[4D91BAC0:01C5463E]
: > X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 7.0.308 [266.10.1]
: >
: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
: >
: > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5463E.4D39888C
: > Content-Type: text/plain;
: > charset="iso-8859-1"
: > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
: >
: > Your message
: >
: > etc
: >
: >
: >
: > "Michael Santovec" <michael_santovec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > news:%23rKf6B6RFHA.2788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > : Are you using Read Receipts?
: > :
: > : OLEXP: Description of Read Receipts in Outlook Express
: > : http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=240915
: > :
: > : It sounds like you might be getting a receipt from his mail server.
: > Looking at the
: > : Message Source (Ctrl-F3) would tell more.
: > :
: > : Possibly, they have some spam filters that are trapping your message.
: > :
: > : --
: > :
: > : Mike - http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm
: > :
: > :
: > : "Ozirbill" <oziebill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > : news:OGxEYBvRFHA.3880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > : >I have been attempting to email my local MP at his government
address,
: > say
: > : > member@xxxxxxxxxx and each time the message is returned
: > : >
: > : > Subject: Not read: my subject
: > : >
: > : > Body:
: > : > To: member@xxxxxxxxxx
: > : >
: > : > Subject: My subject
: > : > Sent: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:45:51 +1000
: > : > was deleted without being read on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:49:44 +1000
: > : >
: > : > Question is why would this happen? His staff deny receiving the
email,
: > I'm
: > : > inclined to believe them as on one occasion the return was on a
Sunday
: > pm.
: > : > The email address is valid. Would it be possible that a large
government
: > : > organisation would delete unread (or unloaded??) messages after so
many
: > : > hours? There seems to be a consistency in the times messages are
: > returned.
: > : >
: > : > Any ideas?
: > : >
: > : > Thanks
: > : >
: > : > Bill
: > : >
: > : > OE6.00.2900 IE6 XPHome SP2
: > : >
: > : >
: > :
: > :
: >
: >
:
:


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blank emails
    ... The issue I was relating comes about because Lotus Notes uses a space ... wraps the string at the space in the message header. ... The message source is always readable no matter how mangled the ... corrupts MIME headers of messages from Lotus Notes, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: Blank emails
    ... The issue I was relating comes about because Lotus Notes uses a space ... wraps the string at the space in the message header. ... The message source is always readable no matter how mangled the ... corrupts MIME headers of messages from Lotus Notes, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: Cant copy "Message Source" area ?
    ... It didn't bring up the message source. ... > into the spam for the ISP to block them? ... The people designing the filters want to see the full headers ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: Finding the Swen Source by Inspecting Msg Headers
    ... >> There are miles and miles of ether between the two as well as a myriad ... >> servers and SPAM filters and privacy filters, ... >> headers as ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: Credit Card Fraud Alert
    ... allows editing of the received mail. ... client makes it easy to see the message source and full headers. ... one reason I dislike most MS Email clients - they've a history of making ...
    (comp.sys.mac.apps)