Re: OE attachments grow in file size
From: Michael Santovec (michael_santovec_at_prodigy.net)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: Michael Santovec: "Re: OE6 sends the same message multiple times"
- Previous message: Bruce Hagen: "Re: Paper Cliip"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: OE attachments grow in file size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:25:10 -0800
What sizes are you looking at? If you are looking at the attachment size, that may be
reporting the original file size and not the encoded size. I have seen some
inconsistencies in OE where it reports the attachment file size.
But the message size has to grow compared to the attached file. In the case of a simple
text file, where quoted-printable encoding is used, the overhead can be as little as 3%.
For other file types, the overheard is typically around 40%.
For some additional information, see:
Decoding Internet Attachments - A Tutorial
http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/decode.htm
-- Mike - http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm "Steve" <nr4p@NOJUNKearthlink.net> wrote in message news:ugKnd.6900$pK6.2425@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... >I appreciate that you spent alot of time on your response. Rest assured the files are >going to someone else typically a family member who has requested it and has high speed. > > But I have tried the same thing on my corporate email (Outlook with MS Exchange server) > and the files do not grow with this magnitude. > > -- > Steve > "Vanguard" <no_email> wrote in message news:OZlLrExzEHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >> "Steve" <nr4p@NOJUNKearthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:6aInd.6685$pK6.4809@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... >>> Whenever I try to take a large file such as a jpegs, zip, or mpeg of about 7-8mb, OE6 >>> reports it as a 12mb file (looking at it in the attachment line). Then my mail service >>> won't take it since its over 10mb. But it definitely is smaller in the Pre-attached >>> state on my HD. >>> >>> OE6 (XP Home sp2), seems to grow attachments by about 40-50%. >>> This does not happen with Outlook on my busness account. >>> >>> Searched MS and googled and haven't seen this. Any ideas why OE6 does this? How to >>> stop it? >>> thanks >>> >>> >> >> >> Whether it is Outlook Express, Outlook, Thunderbird, Pegasus, or whatever e-mail client >> of choice, attachments will ALWAYS be larger when attached to an e-mail then their size >> in the file system. Where do you think the file gets "attached"? There is no separate >> file floating around and following your e-mail. The file is WITHIN the body of your >> e-mail message as a specially encoded plain-text section. That means your file gets >> converted from its binary version to a plain-text version (which takes more bytes). >> >> If you look at the raw message format of your sent message (i.e., copy yourself to you >> get a copy, but which requires you look at it with OE since Outlook bastardizes the >> content of received e-mails into Microsoft's proprietary format which is NOT the actual >> content that got received), you'll see the section showing the encoded version of the >> file you "attached". Now use a hex editor to go look at the content of the file on >> your hard drive (that you attached). Notice that the contents are NOT the same: one is >> binary and the other (in the e-mail) is the converted plain-text version of that binary >> file. If you attached a text file, the encoded MIME part will look very similar but >> include additional formatting info. If you attach a binary file, like a JPEG, the >> encoded MIME part containing the definition of the "attached" file will look very >> different than what you would see in a hex editor. Expect about a 33% average increase >> in the size of the attached file in your e-mail due to the conversion. For example, in >> a test case, sending myself a 2-line message with a 23.8KB JPEG file "attached" to it >> resulted in a received e-mail message that was 38KB in size (a 60% increase in size). >> The text encoding includes compression but the less compressible is a then the larger >> it will be in its converted form within the e-mail, and if it is already a compressed >> file then it might actually inflate more (JPEGs are compressed files). As another >> example, a 4.29KB .txt file will enlarge a test e-mail to 10KB, whereas a 2.18KB .zip >> file with that contains that same .txt file will result in an e-mail message that is >> 8KB in size. So you reduced the file to 50% of its size by compressing it but you only >> gained a 20% for the size of the e-mail (i.e., encoding to plain text with compression >> an already compressed file will actually inflate the size of your e-mail message). >> >> If you are using UUencode to encode your attached file (an old method) then go Google >> on UUencode/UUdecode to see how encoding works for attaching files using that scheme. >> It is likely, however, that you are using MIME to separate the parts of your message. >> One MIME part will contain your message and another MIME part will contain the >> text-encoded version of your attached file. You can search http://www.rfc-editor.org/ >> to find the RFCs that describe MIME and read how it encodes attachments. >> >> The enlargement of the attached file along with throttling of mail servers to provide >> response to all connected users (so one user doesn't usurp all bandwidth with a huge >> message download) along with old servers not handling some content correctly makes >> e-mail a stupid choice for transferring files. E-mail is not designed nor should be >> used as a replacement for FTP (file transfer protocol). If you have a huge file to >> send someone, do you really want to be rude by consuming up a lot of their disk quota >> for their e-mail account and make them waste time to download your huge message which >> they may not want or they only want your message without your picture which might be >> superfluous to your message? Remember that there is still a huge number of user using >> dial-up. Save your file on a server somewhere, like on your personal web pages or >> other online storage, and include a link to it in your message. Then the recipient can >> quickly download your small message and THEY can decide if they want to also download >> your file. >> >> -- >> _________________________________________________________________ >> ******** Post replies to newsgroup - Share with others ******** >> Email: lh_811newsATyahooDOTcom and append "=NEWS=" to Subject. >> _________________________________________________________________ >> >> > >
- Next message: Michael Santovec: "Re: OE6 sends the same message multiple times"
- Previous message: Bruce Hagen: "Re: Paper Cliip"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: OE attachments grow in file size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]