Re: $ Genuine USD $500 reward for *legal* Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express ''hack''
From: Vanguardx (see_signature)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Mark N.: "Outlook Express & Windows XP Service Pack 2"
- Previous message: Vanguardx: "Re: aol newsgroups"
- Maybe in reply to: Richard Urban: "Re: $ Genuine USD $500 reward for *legal* Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express ''hack''"
- Next in thread: Steve Cochran: "Re: $ Genuine USD $500 reward for *legal* Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express ''hack''"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:10:23 -0500
" $ Reward" <ServicePakTwo@yahoo.com>
wrote in news:uHY_c.5129$cb5.4630@hydra.nntpserver.com:
<snip>
> It must be automatic (no action required by the recipient).
<snip>
> This is *not* related to bulk emailling, viruses, hacks, privacy
> invasions, and does not violate any known laws anywhere in the world.
Oh, and of course, spammers never lie. Uh huh, sure, right. Gee, and
we are supposed to be left wondering what possible LEGAL and NON-ABUSIVE
use this could have. You couldn't even come up with some bogus but
plausible excuse for this abuse to covertly get an e-mail recipient to
"phone home" to you. Be aware that the user has agreed to the licensing
for the product they install. Your phoning home in a deliberate attempt
to track them via unauthorized communications makes you legally liable
for abusive content. No wonder you are hiding behind a disposable
webmail account which, of course, surely doesn't violate their Terms of
Use or policies (See their TOS at http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).
Uh huh, right.
> My real email address: ServicePakTwo@yahoo.com - is also on this
> posting: so that I can distinguish between you and the spammers,
> please put the number 500 someplace in your subject if you need to
> contact me.
Oh, a *real* e-mail address using a disposable freebie Yahoo mail
account. Yep, for sure, you are identified now so if you abuse this
hack then you can be identified and prosecuted for the abuse. Sure. I
have real, non-disposable e-mail accounts for real work but, and just
like you, I use disposable webmail accounts or e-mail aliases when I
really don't want to identify myself. Don't expect anyone to believe
that your Yahoo e-mail address will be alive for very long, especially
since you are not using the same e-mail addresses that you used before
in your claimed other prior posts, especially obvious since
"ServicePakTwo" just came out and since you are violating Yahoo's TOS!
> All *constructive* questions, comments, hints, pointers, etc are
> welcomed - reply to me or the group.
Ain't life a bitch when you have no control over what replies get added
to your thread in an unmoderated newsgroup. Go hide in a hacker's
*forum* where the moderator can delete "negative" posts that state such
abuse is actually a bad thing. (Update: Oops, just looked over there.
They don't like you, either.)
> This is not impossible - I personally devised my own Outlook2003
> solution with some extreme lateral thinking: I doubt anyone else will
> copy my idea, but I'll still pay out if by chance someone else finds
> this too.
So who's money are you really spending?
What a bonehead. He posts on a Microsoft news server in an end-users
newgroup rather than nuisancing the hacker and programming newsgroups.
I wonder what so severely crippled a news server this bonehead uses that
cannot manage to crosspost the lack of which obviously doesn't lend any
credibility of the OP regarding the intent of the hack. He can't figure
out how to get a better NNTP server (and obviously won't pay for a
better NNTP server and yet he promises to pay $500 for covert e-mail
abuse) plus he cannot figure out how to do his own work. "Help me, I'm
a dumb script kiddie that couldn't write a line of code to save my life
so I need someone else to do the work for me and I really, really,
really promise to pay." Uh huh, real believable. And, of course, this
idiot doesn't even have the intelligence to include links to his claimed
prior posts but expects us to believe that whatever we find in a Google
search is really him.
Well, I do have to admit that reading his post was entertaining. About
as entertaining as watching "Cops" where they pull over a car after a
weaving pursuit with the stoned moron disavowing any knowledge for the
bag of drugs or loaded gun in his car.
- Next message: Mark N.: "Outlook Express & Windows XP Service Pack 2"
- Previous message: Vanguardx: "Re: aol newsgroups"
- Maybe in reply to: Richard Urban: "Re: $ Genuine USD $500 reward for *legal* Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express ''hack''"
- Next in thread: Steve Cochran: "Re: $ Genuine USD $500 reward for *legal* Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express ''hack''"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
