Re: Expectations

From: Michael Jennings (harvest_at_way.invalid)
Date: 03/22/04


Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:32:24 -0500


"SomewhatAnonymous" <Please@NoSpamWanted.yuk> wrote in message
news:%Gt7c.26924$2d1.22983@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> "Michael Jennings" <harvest@way.invalid> wrote in message
> news:eW1k8K3DEHA.2088@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Indicate to your customers that Microsoft might prefer
>> getting money from users for programs, rather than giving users
>> programs for reasons other than for cash. If this were true,
>> Outlook - a component of Office - would be well supported; however
>> Outlook Express - a subfunction of Internet Explorer - would *not*
>> be well supported. If one expected good support, then, one would
>> prefer Outlook over Outlook Express.
>>
>> The frugal OE user, taking advantage of the generosity of the
>> Microsoft corporation, would need to be somewhat self-supporting.
>>
>> http://insideoe.tomsterdam.com/files/maintain.htm
>>
>> Of course, there are customers to whom this will make no sense.
>
> Actually, most of my customers do have some version of Microsoft Office on
> their computers. Speaking about my business computer users, most of them
> use
> Outlook. They need Excel (and sometimes Access), and so they get exposed
> to
> Outlook at work and become familiar with using it for email too. IMO, my
> home computer users might indeed have some version of Office, but it seems
> to me that most of them only use it for Word (decent letter writing
> abilities). For all I know, it might be that home users prefer OE because
> it
> supports both email and newsgroups. Maybe if MS put newsgroup support in
> Office then that home computer user base might increase? It seems true
> that
> in the home market the only reason to have a computer at all is for
> communications purposes in -all- its formats. Letter writing, email,
> newsgroups, voice and video communications. And lately, online buying. The
> integrated products that do that best and easiest are what gets used in
> that
> market (and at least for now, that's Microsoft products - bundled as
> "free",
> or not).
>
> Anyway, in my decades of experience I've not found that the consumer gives
> a
> rat about support - they hate having to themselves try to use or rely on
> support. They instead come to someone like me to fix a malfunctioning
> product. At that point they are already angry with the product
> manufacture.
> I think their attitude is not one of support but one of name branding, and
> name branding is based upon performance expectations as perceived by the
> customer. While it's my job to fix a product if it is fixable, it
> certainly
> does not include being the mouthpiece of a product manufacture and
> explaining what the manufacture expects of them! No, because the customers
> see it as what THEY expect of the manufacture! I can't argue with that!
> They
> pay for it. Not me, and not the manufacture. The customer pays and has
> expectations. Nothing is free, Michael. It's all included in the bottom
> line
> for the price of the item that something "free" is attached to; to not do
> that would not make financial sense. The customers know that! And they
> have
> their expectations. And when it comes to their money they have a good
> memory
> too!
>
You are running a business and must deal with non-theoretical customers.
Microsoft has been giving away their Internet Explorer-Outlook Express
package for years. Since you've been around for years, you know why.
It really has been free - negative cash flow. Now Netscape is gone.

It's OK by me if you feel it would be wrong to indicate to your customers
a reason that makes sense as a probable cause of an evident condition.

I don't mind if you don't steer them to the helpful website link I
furnished.
You would be helping both them and yourself, in my opinion, but if you
disagree, that's ok.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Special upgrade treatment
    ... If technical support is recommending against any other ... | updates in that series or in any wider selected range of update ... customers, and the quality of LW releases is of public interest. ... and your bug backlog dry up. ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.lightwave)
  • Re: Special upgrade treatment
    ... If you search through this newsgroup, or google "LW 7.5 D morph mixer problems - HELP", you will find a request to confirm a bug in 7.5d, and your support department's "workaround", to wit, "... ... If technical support is recommending against any other | updates in that series or in any wider selected range of update | versions, then by all means I'd like to know about it, and I'd like to | know why. ... customers, and the quality of LW releases is of public interest. ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.lightwave)
  • Re: Special upgrade treatment
    ... > confirm a bug in 7.5d, and your support department's "workaround", to wit, ... If technical support is recommending against any other ... > | updates in that series or in any wider selected range of update ... > customers, and the quality of LW releases is of public interest. ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.lightwave)
  • Re: Extreme!!! Special timelimited competive upgrade offer
    ... I was asked a direct question about why I think a RO user should look at kbmMW, ... Im never going to tell you how you are to run your business, Im sure you know that much better than me. ... have to do all the coding themselfs to support something. ... > customers expect and pay for on top of the technology. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)
  • Re: Extreme!!! Special timelimited competive upgrade offer
    ... > Some examples often required in enterprise setups where competition is ... FAQs and support is much more important to us, ... customers expect and pay for on top of the technology. ... UDP and TCP/IP messaging doesn't work well over secure WANs or Internet ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)