Re: SORRY...forgot to add...

Hello Wandering, it's been a long time. since I, again, have the same
problem of files stuck in the outbox and never get sent out, I thought I'd
ask you about the "Pegasus" email client. You said:

<<I don't use OE for email. I use Pegasus, one feature of which is a
nice ability to do mail merge, and customize each letter, thus sending
out a batch of individual emails. It's full of lots of other fine
features, and free. (v4.41).>>

Is Pegasus function the same as OE? Do you know whether it allows to send
to multiple names without the restriction harassment? I suppose I should go
to their website, and I will, but thought you might be able to fill me in
with info I might not find readily in their site? I don't need mail merge
but hope they are better on multiple send outs...

Thanks so much for any help on this. Adela


"Wandering" <AmoreDei@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:N_-dnQ-hbZ2r0Q_bnZ2dnUVZ_ragnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am beginning to form a clearer picture of what you are trying to
accomplish. Ten years ago, it would have been much easier. Today there
are many spam laws, and ISPs are all afraid of running afoul of them
so they take a variety of measures they see as preventative. Mostly
for folks with large mailing lists it turns out to be inconvenient.

A while ago, I had need to distribute to a list of 120 names.
Fortunately it was a short-lived project with only a few mailings. In
any event, while my ISP managed to digest it well enough, about 1/3 of
the recipients found my message in their spam box and another third
had a warning added that it might be spam. Simply because I sent to so
many.

Yet, another friend mails several times a week to a list of about 250
with about 125 in the To: field and the rest in the CC: field. I don't
like this because in the end they are sending their list of names to
everyone on the list. Who knows what use they will make of it. At
least one has already spammed it.

I don't use OE for email. I use Pegasus, one feature of which is a
nice ability to do mail merge, and customize each letter, thus sending
out a batch of individual emails. It's full of lots of other fine
features, and free. (v4.41).

There are many other bulk mailing email programs out there, many of
which may have the capability to bypass your ISP mail server (smtp). I
think it means Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) Many ISP's don't allow
that, as mine is one, so I send all mail through their server.

Your incoming mail box is your POP server, (Post Office Protocol).
They are actually different computers in many cases.

You will probably continue to encounter a series of problems with
large lists, and using standard mail services it is only likely to
get worse in the future. My only advice is patience and smaller lists.

Please be sure that those you mail to actually want you to mail to
them, or you may run afoul of spam laws or rules of your ISP. More
than one I know has been shut off for what the ISP considered spam.

Have fun, and consider it all an adventure designed to prevent your
days from becoming peaceful and dull. : )





"Adela" <nuevadela2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PKydnXCs7J-JHAzbnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx
Again, Wandering to the rescue! Thanks SO very much! You say
interesting
things but I'm still not well informed about those smtp's, pop's,
etc. I
hope someone knows! LOL! All I know is that my servers and OE are
blaming
one another for this problem, but they aren't the ones who suffer
this bad
inconvenience...

The YahooGroup is another story. I did create a group for one of my
identities, the largest one...but only 23 people of my 240
subscribed! And
precisely this morning I re-sent them an invite...so 2 more
subscribed! I
guess people don't like the pain of subscribing (I hate it too). I
wish
Yahoo just let us send our messages to their maximum allowed without
tormenting the recipients with subscribing, etc....

I was waiting to complete this large list at yahoo so I could do the
same
with my other 2, smaller lists, but it seems I never finish
completing the
first one! :o) I'm extremely disappointed in the internet - what
good is
it if there are so many interferences??? At least in the past with
the
electric typewriter (yes I go way way way back) ;o) whenever I
decided to
reach a number of people, I'd just type the names, then only one
letter
which would retype itself many times and yes, while it was a little
more
work (and noisy LOL!), at least I KNEW the letters got sent out
period. Not
in the internet not, here one never knows if and when they'd get
out, to say
nothing of the .extreme aggravation and time consuming! Sigh! I
thought
some of the MVP's would help. You'd think OE would take a little
more
responsibility?

However, without having to wait until my large YahooGroup list is
complete
and ready for me to send out to all 240 names, I wonder if I could
send them
from my yahoo email, without the group. Not sure but I'll certainly
try,
even though I don't like the web based emails. What do you think?

Again my good friend, thanks so much for your usual useful comments
and
suggestions! :o) Adela


"Wandering" <AmoreDei@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b_GdnaWkkaAOwAzbnZ2dnUVZ_sOknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,

These messages are not very friendly, are they? Nor do they
always
reflect the actual problem. It seems, and I may be wrong, that
your
smtp (outbound mail) server is complaining that the receiving
(POP)
server felt it was getting too many messages that hour for that
person. Since it is just the one message, I don't think it is
your
server complaining, and of course, we have no way to know how many
your friend is receiving, or how many they are allowed in each
hour.

Sometimes some ISP's block others. For instance a number have
blocked
my ISP Comcast. Often the receiving person can spend a lot of time
on
hold and eventually get the block removed, and sometimes they
cannot.
For quite a while I couldn't email my church from Comcast - Now I
can.
In the meantime I used my yahoo account.

I think I would just try that again later, and if it is rejected
then,
I'd just see if I could send from an account like yahoo. It is a
great idea to have such an account in any event, and it's free. I
use
it as my trash collector, mostly. When someone I am not sure of
insists on a valid email address, as many websites do, I give them
yahoo till I see how it all goes. They have great spam filters,
and I
don't have to deal with much crud. I don't use a spam filter at
all on
my comcast account because it is so seldom out there.

Anyway, good luck. Sometimes with email, you just can't get there
from
here. And by the way, the email address I use on the newsgroups is
not
valid. Too many eyes scanning this.


"Adela" <nuevadela2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vZWdnbtTWc6SoAzbnZ2dnUVZ_qqrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx
...that I keep my entire computer, expecially OE, with all
updates
up to
date. When I click on Send/Receive I get this msg all the time:

<<The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was
rejected
by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '@earthlink.net'.
Subject
'Fw: Sunday July 22nd 2pm Soho NYC', Account: 'pop.rcn.com',
Server:
'smtp.rcn.com', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '452 Too many
recipients
received this hour', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error:
452,
Error
Number: 0x800CCC79>>

This: <<Server Response: '452 Too many recipients received this
hour',>> of
course is NOT true. As mentioned below, the highest number of
names
I have
is 240, and right now between the 2 msgs stuck in each identity
are
only a
total of 208 names!

I anticipate my thanks again for a helpful reply. Adela

----- Original Message -----
From: Adela
Newsgroups:
microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.outlookexpress
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:16 PM
Subject: MS MVPs are specialists in OE...pls. help???


(WinXP Home SP2; OE 6; IE 6; Dell Dimension XPS T450MHz Pentium
III;
AVG;
spybot S&D; ad-aware; cable; WordPerfect8; Lexmark Laser printer
"Optra
E310")


Hello...yes, I understand that the Microsoft MVPs (Most Valuable
Professionals): Frank Saunders; Jim Pickering; Paul Berkowitz and
Tom Koch
specialize in OE technical problems so I appeal to them now.
I've
tried
just about everything and am at the end of the rope. Here's the
main
problem:

I have 3 identities, and in all of them the msgs just do not get
sent out
ever! They remain in the outbox until I get tired and delete
them.
(It
started in only one identity, then two then...)

#1 identity has 101 email names to which I need to send messages.
#2 has
107 names, and #3 has 240 names. I rarely if ever send mgs to
all 3
at one
time...

Right now #1 has a msg stuck in the outbox for 3 days sitting
pretty. #2,
stuck in the outbox since June 5!!! #3 will send them out IF I
split the
email names into 25 or 50 names per hour, so it takes me several
actions and
a lot of time to send just ONE msg. My servers told me I'm
allowed
to send
to 400 names all at once per hour...but OE won't send even 100
per
hour!!!

I deleted my 3 identity account settings and re-established them.
Had my
servers check the modem and a number of other tests and
evertything's ok at
their end. I was told to delete and renew the outbox AND send
folders. I
did. Nothing happened.

Recently I had my hard drive wiped out completely and reinstalled
winXP and
all the other programs, including OE6. I thought surely now it
will
work
properly...WRONG!

So...what else is there to do in order to fix this OE sickness???
I
read
all the Microsoft (and other publication) articles on the matter
and
nothing
worked. Would the special MVPs help me to clear this problem
please?

My deepest thanks for ANY help! Adela










.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
    ... are many spam laws, and ISPs are all afraid of running afoul of them ... for folks with large mailing lists it turns out to be inconvenient. ... which may have the capability to bypass your ISP mail server. ... I have 3 identities, and in all of them the msgs just do not get ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.outlookexpress)
  • Re: blacklisting by SORBS
    ... > ISP has been added to the SORBS blacklist as a source of spam. ... similar) to check to see which of the many lists is blocking that IP ... OB fedora: the postfix in fedora works just find to keep outsiders ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Spam Checkers
    ... > Just curious if anybody has had any success with the Spam Checkers ... What you want is one that can access external, dynamic, blocking lists in ... spammer himself. ... If the responsible ISP does not evict the spammer, ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: [OT] Hotmail calls mail from my server spam; how do I contact them?
    ... my ISP seemed to indicate that the problem was that the A record's PTR ... > - they maintain lists of IP blocks belonging to ISPs and Yipes ... "Blackholes.us does not list spammers, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: two e-mail addresses
    ... >how is that going to help with spam?). ... Well except knowing who I gave the new addy to. ... Click on File>Switch Identities, then press the manage identities button and ... In case you're wondering I just got a "real" ISP ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)