Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- From: "Adela" <nuevadela2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:28:07 -0400
Again, Wandering to the rescue! Thanks SO very much! You say interesting
things but I'm still not well informed about those smtp's, pop's, etc. I
hope someone knows! LOL! All I know is that my servers and OE are blaming
one another for this problem, but they aren't the ones who suffer this bad
inconvenience...
The YahooGroup is another story. I did create a group for one of my
identities, the largest one...but only 23 people of my 240 subscribed! And
precisely this morning I re-sent them an invite...so 2 more subscribed! I
guess people don't like the pain of subscribing (I hate it too). I wish
Yahoo just let us send our messages to their maximum allowed without
tormenting the recipients with subscribing, etc....
I was waiting to complete this large list at yahoo so I could do the same
with my other 2, smaller lists, but it seems I never finish completing the
first one! :o) I'm extremely disappointed in the internet - what good is
it if there are so many interferences??? At least in the past with the
electric typewriter (yes I go way way way back) ;o) whenever I decided to
reach a number of people, I'd just type the names, then only one letter
which would retype itself many times and yes, while it was a little more
work (and noisy LOL!), at least I KNEW the letters got sent out period. Not
in the internet not, here one never knows if and when they'd get out, to say
nothing of the .extreme aggravation and time consuming! Sigh! I thought
some of the MVP's would help. You'd think OE would take a little more
responsibility?
However, without having to wait until my large YahooGroup list is complete
and ready for me to send out to all 240 names, I wonder if I could send them
from my yahoo email, without the group. Not sure but I'll certainly try,
even though I don't like the web based emails. What do you think?
Again my good friend, thanks so much for your usual useful comments and
suggestions! :o) Adela
"Wandering" <AmoreDei@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b_GdnaWkkaAOwAzbnZ2dnUVZ_sOknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
These messages are not very friendly, are they? Nor do they always
reflect the actual problem. It seems, and I may be wrong, that your
smtp (outbound mail) server is complaining that the receiving (POP)
server felt it was getting too many messages that hour for that
person. Since it is just the one message, I don't think it is your
server complaining, and of course, we have no way to know how many
your friend is receiving, or how many they are allowed in each hour.
Sometimes some ISP's block others. For instance a number have blocked
my ISP Comcast. Often the receiving person can spend a lot of time on
hold and eventually get the block removed, and sometimes they cannot.
For quite a while I couldn't email my church from Comcast - Now I can.
In the meantime I used my yahoo account.
I think I would just try that again later, and if it is rejected then,
I'd just see if I could send from an account like yahoo. It is a
great idea to have such an account in any event, and it's free. I use
it as my trash collector, mostly. When someone I am not sure of
insists on a valid email address, as many websites do, I give them
yahoo till I see how it all goes. They have great spam filters, and I
don't have to deal with much crud. I don't use a spam filter at all on
my comcast account because it is so seldom out there.
Anyway, good luck. Sometimes with email, you just can't get there from
here. And by the way, the email address I use on the newsgroups is not
valid. Too many eyes scanning this.
"Adela" <nuevadela2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vZWdnbtTWc6SoAzbnZ2dnUVZ_qqrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx
...that I keep my entire computer, expecially OE, with all updatesup to
date. When I click on Send/Receive I get this msg all the time:rejected
<<The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was
by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '@earthlink.net'.Subject
'Fw: Sunday July 22nd 2pm Soho NYC', Account: 'pop.rcn.com', Server:recipients
'smtp.rcn.com', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '452 Too many
received this hour', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 452,Error
Number: 0x800CCC79>>hour',>> of
This: <<Server Response: '452 Too many recipients received this
course is NOT true. As mentioned below, the highest number of namesI have
is 240, and right now between the 2 msgs stuck in each identity areonly a
total of 208 names!AVG;
I anticipate my thanks again for a helpful reply. Adela
----- Original Message -----
From: Adela
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.outlookexpress
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:16 PM
Subject: MS MVPs are specialists in OE...pls. help???
(WinXP Home SP2; OE 6; IE 6; Dell Dimension XPS T450MHz Pentium III;
spybot S&D; ad-aware; cable; WordPerfect8; Lexmark Laser printer"Optra
E310")Tom Koch
Hello...yes, I understand that the Microsoft MVPs (Most Valuable
Professionals): Frank Saunders; Jim Pickering; Paul Berkowitz and
specialize in OE technical problems so I appeal to them now. I'vetried
just about everything and am at the end of the rope. Here's themain
problem:sent out
I have 3 identities, and in all of them the msgs just do not get
ever! They remain in the outbox until I get tired and delete them.(It
started in only one identity, then two then...)#2 has
#1 identity has 101 email names to which I need to send messages.
107 names, and #3 has 240 names. I rarely if ever send mgs to all 3at one
time...pretty. #2,
Right now #1 has a msg stuck in the outbox for 3 days sitting
stuck in the outbox since June 5!!! #3 will send them out IF Isplit the
email names into 25 or 50 names per hour, so it takes me severalactions and
a lot of time to send just ONE msg. My servers told me I'm allowedto send
to 400 names all at once per hour...but OE won't send even 100 perhour!!!
Had my
I deleted my 3 identity account settings and re-established them.
servers check the modem and a number of other tests andevertything's ok at
their end. I was told to delete and renew the outbox AND sendfolders. I
did. Nothing happened.winXP and
Recently I had my hard drive wiped out completely and reinstalled
all the other programs, including OE6. I thought surely now it willwork
properly...WRONG!read
So...what else is there to do in order to fix this OE sickness??? I
all the Microsoft (and other publication) articles on the matter andnothing
worked. Would the special MVPs help me to clear this problemplease?
My deepest thanks for ANY help! Adela
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- From: Wandering
- Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- References:
- SORRY...forgot to add...
- From: Adela
- Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- From: Wandering
- SORRY...forgot to add...
- Prev by Date: Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- Next by Date: Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- Previous by thread: Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- Next by thread: Re: SORRY...forgot to add...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|