Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?

From: Jim Carlock (anonymous_at_127.0.0.1)
Date: 03/26/04 

Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:09:39 -0500

Microsoft doesn't make only one OS.

WinXP has a different oleaut32.dll than Win2k than Win9x than
DOS. Point in case, Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20
operating systems all different in many ways, all similar in many
ways. A global attack on Windows machines won't affect every
Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS.

Being that DOS IS a variation of Unix whats the difference? That
DOS uses a backslash and Unix uses a forward slash?

I'm just being stupid by posting to this message, but I think I have
a somewhat unobtrusive point to present. 

-- 
Jim Carlock
http://www.microcosmotalk.com/
Post replies to the newsgroup.
"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:eALvwJ94DHA.1816@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
> Kurt;
> Stay with your facts.
I did, notice that I was quoting myself.
> I never even suggested "one big target of an OS" is the way to go.
You were disputing my arguement that MS's monopoy OS is what is the biggest
security hole for the general public by blaming the general public.
> Those are your words and ideas.
Which you were trying to dispute by blaming the victims, rather than the
delivery system of being locked into one big fat target of a Desktop OS.
> You seem to need to falsely put statements to others in order to
> support your ideas.
No, I trying to actually get you to confront my ideas, instead of doing the
side-step shuffle to protect your Masters.
> To bad you can not support your point on its own merit.
I already have, it's you that have not support any contrary point the
dimishes my opinion in the slightest bit.
> Furthermore you start to name calling.
What else could you be called when you only answer that most inconsequential
part of my post, and leave the meat of it untouched?  That's exactly the
tactics of a troll.
> Name calling is strong evidence that you lack the ability to support
> your own point of view.
My point has been proved, and only the MicroDeafDumb&Blind can't see it.
MS's desktop OS monopoly is the biggest security risk for the general public
today, because that one giant-assed target can't help from getting hit.
It's a hell of a lot easier to hit one bird with one stone, than two birds
with one stone.  I have common sense on my side, you have only your
unwavering devotion to MS to back you up.
Thank you!
-- 
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. ... operating systems all different in many ways, ... Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... > To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. ... operating systems all different in many ways, ... Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... > To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. ... operating systems all different in many ways, ... Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... > To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. ... operating systems all different in many ways, ... Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... > To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. ... operating systems all different in many ways, ... Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... > To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
Quantcast