Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- From: Vadikan <Vadikan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:34:01 -0700
I'm not sure if MVPs can translate content for Microsoft, but they can
certainly do so for the community.
Ok, enough offtopic :)
--
Vadim Sterkin
MVP Windows Shelll/User
http://unattended.oszone.net
"Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote:
no problem, i thought maybe MVP were translating content for MS.
--
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
"Vadikan" <Vadikan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3553D139-8742-449B-B33A-F15AE7FFA920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for your reply, Anthony! It makes sense and does help with
trasnlastion :) I appreciate your help.
To satisfy your curiosity, Mathieu, we have a small online translators
club
at oszone.net. It's "private", though, which means you can only join it by
an
invitation. Needless to say, fluent Russian is a must :)
--
Vadim Sterkin
MVP Windows Shelll/User
http://unattended.oszone.net
"Anthony" wrote:
Vadikan,
Judging from the context, I think the author is referring to the
different
types of policy settings. Some are fixed, can not be changed by the user,
and are set back if changed by non-policy means. Some are "Preference".
The
setting is initially set, but can be changed and is not set back
(enforced).
For example, the Internet Explorer settings can be Enforced, or they can
be
Preferences. The distinction the author seems to be making is that
Enforced
settings in the registry are converted into Vista settings, while the
Preference settings are omitted (there would be no way of knowing at the
client if the setting was the policy setting or had been changed). This
means that the original policy in AD would be applied again when the user
first logged on.
"Migration" appears simply to mean a fresh install but in the same GPO
domain. It is rather self evident that the local policy settings would
not
"migrate" in this case!
Hope that helps with translation.
Anthony,
http://www.airdesk.co.uk
"Vadikan" <Vadikan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:14E1E740-CEEF-4692-AF8C-AA74C8A55E79@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hmm... that doesn't answer either of my questions. Both questions are
valid,
even if I'm not translating anything. I'd appreciate any input on the
subject.
--
Vadim Sterkin
MVP Windows Shelll/User
http://unattended.oszone.net
"Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote:
Hello,
are you translating on your own or is there a translation program
where
people can participate?
--
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
"Vadikan" <Vadikan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7572C529-B1AA-4F3A-B4C2-11A3214D1039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All!
While translating "Deploying Group Policy Using Windows Vista"
[http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/5ae8da2a-878e-48db-a3c1-4be6ac7cf7631033.mspx?mfr=true]
article from English to Russian I ran across some terminology I need
additional clarfication on. I hope GP gurus would be able to figure
out
what
the author was talking about :)
Specifically, there's a table in "Group Policy changes after
migrating
or
upgrading to Windows Vista" section of the article. There's a row
titled
"Registry-based policy settings" in this table. In this row there
are
three
points in the "Upgrade behavior" column:
. All policy settings and values under the Software\Policy registry
key
are
migrated.
. Preference settings are not migrated.
. All of the policy settings are reapplied from the domain on first
restart
after first logon.
I'm not sure what the "preference settings" are (the second point).
Conesquently I'm not sure whose preference settings the author is
talking
about. I'd appreciate any input on this issue.
And while I'm on this table, does anybody have an idea what
"migration"
is
in the context of this section? Generally, it's a pretty broad term,
but
the
author apparently views "migration" as something opposite to
"upgrade".
In
my
understanding, "upgrade" means installing Vista over existing OS
(e.g.
XP).
An opposite to the upgrade would be "clean installation", but the
author
does
not use this term, and uses "migration" instead. Any clues?
Thanks for your time and attention to my questions!
--
MVP Windows Shelll/User
http://unattended.oszone.net
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP migra
- From: Mathieu CHATEAU
- Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- From: Vadikan
- Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- From: Anthony
- Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- From: Vadikan
- Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- From: Mathieu CHATEAU
- Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP migra
- Prev by Date: Re: software restrictions problem
- Next by Date: Re: A strange problem in deploying software by Group Policy
- Previous by thread: Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- Next by thread: Re: Need clarifications on registry-based policy settings and GP m
- Index(es):