Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- From: joshua.morgan@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Aug 2006 01:51:42 -0700
Would this then mean that if for whatever reason a
OU/domain/site-linked GPO isn't applied that the local computer policy
would be enforced?
For example, if a user logged in and pulled the network cable out
during the Group Policy-applying stage (meaning that an
OU/domain/site-linked GPO doesn't apply) would the local policy then be
enforced, and if an OU/domain/site-linked GPO *does* apply then the
local policy isn't enforced?
Thanks,
Joshua Morgan
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
Setting is the local policy have the lowest priority and would only take
effect if there were no conflicts with GPO based settings.
The order of priority, not considering use of "no override"/"enforced" or
of "blocked inheritance", is GPOs linked to the Site, Domain, OU, nearer
nested OUs and then finally, at lowest priority (and not able to block
anything from above) the Local policy.
"Gunna" <gunna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23tFnd3NyGHA.2300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a XP machine that has its default local policy set after being
built.
I have added this to a domain which I use group policies to sewt various
options etc. How do these 2 react when the settings on the local policy
and
the matching setting on the domain gp conflict? Which get priority or is
there a way I can set this?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- From: Florian Frommherz
- Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- References:
- local gp v's domain based gp
- From: Gunna
- Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- local gp v's domain based gp
- Prev by Date: Re: Local administratotor rights on target machines
- Next by Date: Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- Previous by thread: Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- Next by thread: Re: local gp v's domain based gp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
