Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: "Warner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Warnernospampostalias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:05:02 -0700
I've done what you've suggested and the user policy will not apply based on
the computer being in the group or OU. Even with the Loopback policy, the
user policy will not apply with the computer being in the group or the OU.
It only wants to apply the user policy with the user's access. It doesn't
seem to matter whether the computer is in the group or the OU.
I want to confirm that the loop back policy is designed to apply the user
policy based on the security access or OU membership of the computer account.
Is that correct?
If this is correct, it does not seem to work.
Thanks,
Warner.
"Roger Abell" wrote:
> The use of loopback GPO processing causes user policies
> to be applied even though the user object are not in the OU.
> That is why loopback was mentioned in all responses so far.
> The machines that have read/apply will see the machine
> policy that says to do loopback - this gives you control over
> which machines will cause the user policies (due to loopback)
> to be enforced. Users will also need read/apply for their
> login at a machine where the loopback processing is active
> to have an affect on their login.
>
> --
> Roger Abell
> Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> "Warner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Warnernospampostalias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote in message news:EE7F4D48-285A-48D2-889B-1BC8961AF458@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > That sounds good, except that the policy I want to utilize is the
> > screensaver. For HIPAA security we need to force a screensaver out to all
> > networked PCs, but there are a few exceptions. I was trying to avoid
> > creating multiple OUs to resolve this.
> > Unfortunately the screensaver is a user policy and not a computer policy
> and
> > therefore it looks like we can not control it based on the computer with
> just
> > a GPO and security groups.
> >
> > Any other thoughts? Thanks for your help.
> > Warner.
> >
> > "Roger Abell" wrote:
> >
> > > oops - I had a major lapse there
> > > You do not need a subOU.
> > > Since loopback processing is a machine policy you could
> > > link the new loopback GPO on the original OU and use
> > > security group processing so that it will apply to the
> > > group of machines on which it should have an effect and
> > > on the users for which it should be effective, after removing
> > > the read/apply for Authenticated Users.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Roger Abell
> > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> > > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:u2FtzEfOFHA.624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > I see no way to do precisely that, at least not without
> > > > OU restructure. If you would define a new subOU and
> > > > move all machines except the exempt ones into the new
> > > > subOU, and then link a GPO set to use loopback processing
> > > > on the new subOU then you could effect the objective with
> > > > minimum restructure/redef of existing OUs and GPOs.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Roger Abell
> > > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> > > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> > > > "Warner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> > > <Warnernospampostalias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote in message
> > > news:325DB1CD-5157-42B7-9EC4-46AAC125734D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Is is possible to Apply a User Policy only if the Computer account
> is a
> > > > > member of a security group?
> > > > > I have a user policy that I want applied to all computers except a
> few.
> > > I
> > > > > would like to control this based on a security group rather than an
> OU.
> > > > Is
> > > > > this possible?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Warner.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Roger Abell
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Jim Vierra
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- References:
- Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Warner@nospam.postalias
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Roger Abell
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Roger Abell
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Warner@nospam.postalias
- Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- From: Roger Abell
- Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- Prev by Date: Software install problems
- Next by Date: Re: adm template doesn't work!?
- Previous by thread: Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- Next by thread: Re: Controlling User Policy via Computer account
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|