RE: 1058 and 1030 errors revisited
From: Juan (Juan_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: Juan: "Re: GPO / VBScript problem"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Manually added user rights assignments"
- In reply to: Perry: "1058 and 1030 errors revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 07:43:03 -0700
Okay. I don't have read your thread but. Please visit the following site.
I've discussed a lot of about these errors.
http://www.winnetmag.com/Forums/messageview.cfm?catid=54&threadid=61734
regards
Juan
"Perry" wrote:
> I would also like to submit a problem with our Domain GPO
> and the notorious 1058 event. I have read everything about
> it on this site, the eventid site and on the Microsoft
> support site; however, the problem(s) described there do
> not correspond to our problems (Q842804 deals with
> computers resuming from standby of restart - ours are not
> in these modes when this happens); and, although I have
> tried all the suggestions mentioned at these sites, the
> problem still won't go away.
>
> But before I discuss this, I would like to contribute with
> a solution to a possible diagnosis of the origin of some
> of the problems I have seen. This is because I
> inadvertently managed to produce the 1058 event through a
> mistake in configuration. What happened was this: when I
> first install a 2003 server I usually try to avoid virus
> infection by immediately downloading and installing the
> newest updates. However, the computer is exposed for a
> very short time to the Internet without any protection. So
> I usually turn on the firewall and turn off NetBios and
> file-sharing on the NIC. Normally, I turn file-sharing
> back on afterwards, but in this one case I forgot to do
> so. Everything seemed ok, so I ran dcpromo and rebooted,
> but then I got the infamous 1058 - 1030 event pair. When I
> tried to run the gpofix utility I got a "network path not
> found" error which tipped me off to the fact that I had
> forgotten to switch file-sharing back on. I did so and
> rebooted the pc, but this didn't help at all. The point
> is: it seems that having file-sharing off when running
> dcpromo messes up AC somehow. I ran dcpromo again to
> uninstall AC rebooted and reinstalled AC. At this point
> everything worked just fine. A hint to the programmers at
> Microsoft: have dcpromo check the pc to see if all of the
> conditions (like filesharing) for AC are met before
> installing AC.
>
> Now to our problem:
>
> We have very successfully run a w2k domain at our school
> for the last three years or so. We have four servers to
> share the workload: one for AD, one for Exchange 2000, one
> for ISA 2000 and one for NAS. There are about sixty client
> pc's running XP Pro and these all connect through high
> capacity HP Procurve switches. The clients all have 100
> Mbps NICs, whereas the servers all have two gigabit
> adapters each. We have never experienced any networking
> problems - the switch monitors show few or no packets
> dropped, and, with the exception of the occasional printer
> error, the event logs on both clients and servers have
> been error free for the last three years - which is
> impressive, considering that we are talking about a school
> here.
>
> However, the servers were beginning to show their age - we
> had run an NT network on them before - so we opted to
> replace the four servers with newer ones with more
> processing power (dual CPUs) more memory, SCSI raid
> storage and (continued) multihomed gigabit NIC capacity.
> When we bought the machines, we also decided to upgrade
> the server software to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and ISA
> 2004. At the same time, we installed Service Pack 2 on the
> XP clients.
>
> We printed out our old w2k GPOs and used these to
> configure the new servers pretty much the same as the old
> ones were. Everything works fine - just as before - with
> one exception. When more than approximately ten people try
> to log on to the network at the same time, those client
> machines that attempt the logon freeze for about 30
> minutes. When this happens, we get the 1058 - 1030 userenv
> event pair - usually for user SYSTEM on both the DC and
> the client machine application logs. Sometimes this is
> also followed by the same id pair for user ADMINISTRATOR -
> on the DC and the logon username on the client.
> Eventually, the users get logged in, but this makes the
> entire network unusable for classroom teaching, where up
> to 50 users log on simultaneously at the start of each
> classroom hour.
>
> Note that the system works fine otherwise. The GPOs are
> applied correctly. This seems to be a network issue. We
> noticed that after applying Service Pack 2 on the XP
> clients that the application event log on client machines
> is always full of MrxSmb event id 3019 errors that were
> never there before. We have no unusual shares anywhere,
> and certainly none on the client machines. We assume it
> has something to do with this, but we are not sure. As I
> mentioned before, our network infrastructure, which worked
> fine under w2k, has not changed, and our switch monitors
> show no noticeable traffic overload nor dropped packets. I
> have tried the solutions mentioned elsewhere on this
> forum, but I have not read of anyone having this problem
> in exactly the same manner. I have even tried something
> that no one else has tried: I noticed that it is the
> Default Domain Policy that is listed in the event id
> error - not any of the other GPOs - so I disabled it and
> moved some of the more important stuff down to the other
> GPOs. That did not help - I still got the same errors with
> the same Domain GPO SID listed.
>
> There is one thing I have not tried which was mentioned
> here in this forum. I have not turned on file sharing on
> the clients and offline folders are switched off. This was
> the way the clients were configured before (this is a
> school, after all, where file sharing cannot be allowed
> under any circumstances because of tests and exams, which
> are all taking on the computer) and it worked fine under
> w2k. I cannot see that this should affect the network load
> which the AD machine is placed under in anyway. The AD
> runs integrated DNS and DHCP. There are no other services
> running on the AD machine besides LanSafe (UPS) and
> TrendMicro Server Protect, but the SYSVOL folder is
> excluded in its entirety from virus scans.
>
> Perhaps someone in this forum can see something that I am
> missing. I would appreciate any advice.
>
>
- Next message: Juan: "Re: GPO / VBScript problem"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Manually added user rights assignments"
- In reply to: Perry: "1058 and 1030 errors revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
