Re: GPO Security Filtering
From: Darren Mar-Elia (dmanonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/17/04
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Desktop restriction on Terminal Server"
- Previous message: Jim Smith: "GPO Security Filtering"
- In reply to: Jim Smith: "GPO Security Filtering"
- Next in thread: Jimmy Andersson [MVP]: "Re: GPO Security Filtering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:08:52 -0700
Jim-
As you've probably noticed, a GPO grants Authenticated Users the 'read' and
'apply group policy' permissions by default when its created. This means
that any user or computer under its influence will process the GPO by
default. This is usually ok unless you further need to filter the policy. I
try avoid removing the default Authenticated User permission unless I
really, truly need to filter GPO application. It just makes it simpler to
troubleshoot and maintain policy if you're only using security group
filtering when you absolutely need to, for exceptions rather than for normal
GPO processing. That would be my recommendation.
-- Darren Mar-Elia MS-MVP-Windows Management http://www.gpoguy.com "Jim Smith" <hous200@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:OX3xe8%23gEHA.3320@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > What are recommendation's for setting permissions on GPO's? Should the > settings apply only to users and groups that are affected by the GPO, or > to > a more general Authenticated Users? > > In the GPMC, on the Scope tab for a GPO there is a section on the lower > half > titled 'Security Filtering' with the wording 'The settings in the GPO can > only apply to the following groups, users, and computers:' > > Thanks for everyone's input. > >
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Desktop restriction on Terminal Server"
- Previous message: Jim Smith: "GPO Security Filtering"
- In reply to: Jim Smith: "GPO Security Filtering"
- Next in thread: Jimmy Andersson [MVP]: "Re: GPO Security Filtering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading