Re: Local GPO
From: Roger Abell [MVP] (mvpNoSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 03/01/04
- Previous message: Brian Desmond [MVP]: "Re: XPvsW2k"
- In reply to: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Next in thread: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Reply: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Reply: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:40:35 -0700
Terence,
I may have only confused you.
Local Security Policy should the local group policy.
I was just trying to make some awareness of policy vs preference.
AFAIK secedit /export is currently broken for XP local policy.
I am not sure what you are and are not seeing with RSoP, but it sounds
as if you are seeing that it say there are no AD based GPOs applicable.
-- Roger "Terence" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:AF2A3809-1DBF-46A1-AD9D-FB3CFFCADD36@microsoft.com... > Thanks for all your help. > I'm doing studies on Windows 2003 Group Policy, and would like to know how to find out the RSOP for a server from Group Policies. > > Let me clarify/conclude my understanding here: > 1. All Windows 2003 Servers have Local GPO. But Local GPO for Domain Controllers applies to restore mode only. > 2. The Local Security Settings shows the current settings, not the Local GPO. > > But how can we get the actual Local GPO? "gpedit.msc" can do ? How about "secedit /export /cfg" ? > One more strange thing is that if the Local Security Setting show the current settings, why the RSOP of GPMC shows no settings applied but Local Secuity Setting does ? > > > > > ----- Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: ----- > > Just a point of clarification. On domain controllers it appears > as if there is no local policy. In fact there is, but it only applies > to the restore mode. > > "Chriss3" <noSpamHere@chrisse.se> wrote in message > news:ug125Dx$DHA.552@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > inline > >> -- > > Regards > > Christoffer Andersson > >> No email replies please - reply in the newsgroup > >> "Terence" <terencewong@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandet > > news:544AC59B-B737-42DB-BD79-1131B162BDDD@microsoft.com... > >> Forgive me if it is a stupid question. > >>>> Facts: > >>>> Microsoft's documentation "Windows Server 2003 Group Policy > > Infrastructure" says that "Local GPO: Each computer has exactly one GPO > that > > is stored locally, shared by all users of that computer. This processes > for > > both computer and user Group Policy processing". > >>>> Questions: > >> 1. Do all kind of servers have Local GPO, i.e. Domain Controller, > Member > > Server, Standalone Server. It seems that after promoting to Domain > > Controller, the Local Security Settings MMC snap-in is no longer exist. > Is > > this means that the Local GPO has been removed, or we can't change the > Local > > GPO anymore ? > >> [Chtistoffer] Yes every Windows2000 , Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 > > computer have a Local Group Policy, inluced Domain Controllers. You supose > > to use the Default Domain Controllers Policy linked to the Domain > > Controllers OU for define policy settings for Domain Controllers within a > > Domain. How ever you can type gpedit.msc to configure an invidual policy > for > > the particular Domain Controller. but i don't recommend you to do so. > >>> 2. By using GPMC to generate RSOP for a Member Server, the report > > indicates that Local GPO has been denied due to "Empty". But by looking > at > > the Local Security Setting, where are plenty of configurated settings. > > What's going on ? > >> [Christoffer] Whitout know anything about other policys within your > > enveirorment. The Local Group Policy may are overwtitten by a higher-level > > linked Policy within Active Directory. > >>>>> Any hints are appreciated. Thanks. > >>>>>> Terence > >>
- Previous message: Brian Desmond [MVP]: "Re: XPvsW2k"
- In reply to: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Next in thread: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Reply: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Reply: Terence: "Re: Local GPO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|