Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- From: "Dilip Naik" <DilipCNaik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:35:06 -0700
How exactly is it telling you that the remote volume is NTFS?
"linearred" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:eNxVZ3B6IHA.3784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes -- we're using Samba to access Solaris file services from Windows. After some thrashing around Google, it looks like ADS support only exists in experimental branches of Samba 3, but is something they have (or at least had at one time) on the list for Samba 4. But as to why the service reports NTFS, if indeed ADS is actually required for NTFS compliance, I don't know.
Thanks.
I'm not quite understanding: are you accessing a drive on a Unix box
via Samba? In that case the drive being accessed is probably using
UFS, which wouldn't have ADS. But then why is it telling you that it's
NTFS? Maybe that's a Samba thing.
--
Tim Slattery
MS MVP(Shell/User)
Slattery_T@xxxxxxx
http://members.cox.net/slatteryt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- From: linearred
- Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- References:
- NTFS and alternate data streams
- From: linearred
- Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- From: Tim Slattery
- Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- From: linearred
- NTFS and alternate data streams
- Prev by Date: Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- Next by Date: Re: DFS- Limitation?
- Previous by thread: Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- Next by thread: Re: NTFS and alternate data streams
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading