Re: Max recommened SAN disk size
- From: IainM <IainM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 00:55:01 -0700
Using diskpart to expand partitions is not a problem, I've done it a few
times before without a hitch. My problem is that I'm not sure how large I
should make each SAN drive based on issues like time to restore, run chkdsk,
etc.
For example is 2 x 500Gb disks better for administration purposes that a 1Tb
disk?
Thanks for replying,
Iain
"John Fullbright" wrote:
Some vendors provide a way to dynamically expand a disk, and diskpart is not.
required. Who is the vendor? Do they do this? If not, then the vendor
most likely will have guidance on how to use diskpart to expand a LUN. I
would follow your specific storage vendor's guidance.
"IainM" <IainM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C73F6B1D-BA56-4B15-9735-B139D216DD44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have servers running Win 2003 Standard with SAN based disks. Some disks
are around 500Gb and I want to expand them using diskpart.exe.
Is there a maximum recommended disk size for SAN drives? I'm not referring
to the maximum disk size technically possible.
I'm thinking about backup/restore times in the event a partition gets
screwed, times to run disk checks, etc.
Any info on experiences much appreciated.
Iain
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Max recommened SAN disk size
- From: anon
- Re: Max recommened SAN disk size
- References:
- Max recommened SAN disk size
- From: IainM
- Re: Max recommened SAN disk size
- From: John Fullbright
- Max recommened SAN disk size
- Prev by Date: RE: DFS Shares not working properly
- Next by Date: GetDiskFreeSpaceEx returns disk free space without considering user-quota
- Previous by thread: Re: Max recommened SAN disk size
- Next by thread: Re: Max recommened SAN disk size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading