RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- From: v-xuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Vincent Xu [MSFT])
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:13:33 GMT
Hi ,
VOLSNAP.SYS driver used to take and manage volume snapshots requires paged
pool memory to keep track of previous versions of files. The amount of
paged pool used for a snapshot with sufficiently many files touched on it
is about 1 byte per file. Whenever a new block of 65536 files is touched,
65536 bytes of paged pool are allocated. However, this also all depends on
how many snapshots are currently mounted.
This works out so that a server with 2 million files or less and 64
snapshots will always stay below the recommended 128 MB of paged pool
threshold. A server with more files might be able to manipulate the
snapshot storage size so that fewer than 64 snapshots are kept.
Solution:
Reduce the amount of snapshot storage used for all volumes so that your
total paged pool usage stays within limits. You can use VSSADMIN.EXE to
re-size the shadow storage size as seen in the sample batch file:
EXAMPLE: (where s: is the volumes used for shadow copies)
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=f: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=g: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=h: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=i: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=j: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=k: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=l: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=m: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=n: /on=s: /maxsize=30GB
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=x: /on=s: /maxsize=10GB
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================
--------------------
<qqEoj0U1GHA.2156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Thread-Topic: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
thread-index: AcbXe6FeJZ7OY4OKQB2NKQ7IZ2YGOg==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 67.107.239.103
From: =?Utf-8?B?RGFuIERhdmlz?= <In_Finite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5D99363C-DA85-4101-9AE3-6AECF5661F08@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
sinceSubject: RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:29:01 -0700
Lines: 194
Message-ID: <FCEEE082-70D6-4279-84E1-EAD00234E846@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.file_system
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.file_system:9775
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.file_system
Vincent,
I'm not sure you read my full post. Please read my full post.
I did provide a poolmon report showing the npp usage.
I'm currently getting an Event ID 20 after a reboot.
I am NOT using /3G
I typically maintain 15-20 snapshots of 1.8 million files taking around
500GB of storage.
From what I understand, I'm well within sane limits of VSS, yet it stillfails to maintain snapshots between reboots. This is very unacceptable
someboth MS & Veritas boast so well about this type of setup.
-Dan
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
Hi,
Based on the error event log, I performed lots of research and I found
non-pagedpossible cause:
Cause 1
A driver installed on the system is using an excessive amount of
returnedpool. This may indicate a memory leak. See ¡°SOX040818700038 Error
poolwhile creating the volume shadow copy:80¡±
Solution
Install Poolmon.exe and monitor on the system. Poolmon will list which
thetags are consuming non-paged pool. We can then determine the driver by
matching up the pool tag in the KB. If the KB does not contain a good
pointer we can then try the following. On the system in question run
thosefollowing command.
findstr /mi <PoolTagListing> <Path to search>
This will search inside of all files in the search path and point out
eachthat contain the suspect pool tag. We can then attempt to eliminate
asdriver in the listing. Be sure to search %systemroot%\system32 as well
paged\program files
Cause 2:
VOLSNAP.SYS driver used to take and manage volume snapshots requires
itpool memory to keep track of previous versions of files. The amount of
paged pool used for a snapshot with sufficiently many files touched on
touched,is about 1 byte per file. Whenever a new block of 65536 files is
on65536 bytes of paged pool are allocated. However, this also all depends
serverhow many snapshots are currently mounted. This works out so that a
thewith 2 million files or less and 64 snapshots will always stay below
mightrecommended 128 MB of paged pool threshold. A server with more files
thatbe able to manipulate the snapshot storage size so that fewer than 64
snapshots are kept.
Solution:
Reduce the amount of snapshot storage used for all volumes so that your
total paged pool usage stays within limits. You can use VSSADMIN.EXE to
re-size the shadow storage size.
EXAMPLE: (where s: is the volumes used for shadow copies)
vssadmin resize shadowstorage /for=<drive letter>: /on=s: /maxsize=36GB
Cause 3:
3GB enabled in the boot.ini. In some cases, if we look at the drivers
amountare currently installed, the size of the snapshot storage, and the
soof data being written on the server, we may just run out of pool space.
With 3GB enabled reduces the amount of pool we have available to us
compared to a system without 3GB.
Solution:
Remove the 3GB switch from the boot.ini
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
rights.that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
the======================================================
--------------------
Thread-Topic: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
thread-index: AcbTgKv2vb6ymLO6Q/i3OMAz6uA1Sg==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 67.107.239.103
From: =?Utf-8?B?RGFuIERhdmlz?= <In_Finite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:55:02 -0700
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <5D99363C-DA85-4101-9AE3-6AECF5661F08@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.file_system
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.file_system:9744
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.file_system
UPDATE: The NPP problem seems to have subsided, but probably because
theVSS
changes are minimal and the bitmap for the snapshot hasn't exceeded
kindloseremaining NPP. What has not changed is that after a reboot, we still
spaceany previous snapshots.
Event ID: 20
Source: VolSnap
The shadow copies of volume D: were aborted because of a failed free
computation.
Are there any new VolSanp updates that I can't find or is there soem
hope,of
alternate solution I'm missing?
OLD POST=============
KB article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913648/en-us promsies
anyet
fails to deliver.
I'm using Veritas Backup Exec 10d CPS to pull from 4 other servers to
are8TB
volume (D:\CPS\BD1\); we're about 50% capacity right now. Changes
couplefairly
minimal through the day, ranging from a few hundred MB to maybe a
shadowGB.
CPS is a writer for VSS and takes hourly snapshots to a dedicated
Eventdrive/volume (E:\).
Oh, things work great for about 4 days until the inevitable VolSnap
insufficientID: 5
"The shadow copy of volume D: could not be created due to
available,non-paged memory pool for a bitmap structure."
Yah, well I've been following the VSS updates as they become
'Systemeach
thiswith its own set of promises unfulfilled. What's really whacky about
error is that it claims the NPP is exhausted. I'm using Mark's
135,328MBInformation', which shows NPP Limit is 261,756MB of which only
VSShave
been consumed (Poolmon shows the same usage). This must infer that
rebootis
request,asking for more than 126,428MB to create its bitmap, or that in its
doesn't leave enough NPP leftover. Within the first two days of a
NPP
is right up there near 125MB used, so why does the next 10MB kill it?
Top 15 offenders of NPP
VoSm Nonp 61,042,712 [volsnap.sys - Bitmap allocations]
CMpa Nonp 16,083,968 [nt!cm - registry post apcs]
MmCm Nonp 8,757,520 [nt!mm - Calls made to MmAllocateC
CM44 Nonp 8,042,152 Unknown Driver
SeTd Nonp 2,661,440 [nt!se - Security Token dynamic pa
LSwi Nonp 2,584,576 [<unknown> - initial work context
MmCa Nonp 2,443,616 [nt!mm - Mm control areas for mapp
Vad Nonp 1,514,544 [nt!mm - Mm virtual address descri
TCPt Nonp 1,456,480 Unknown Driver
File Nonp 1,354,232 [<unknown> - File objects]
Pool Nonp 1,134,592 [<unknown> - Pool tables, etc.]
Thre Nonp 906,672 [nt!ps - Thread objects]
NDpp Nonp 702,864 [ndis.sys - packet pool]
Even Nonp 593,216 [<unknown> - Event objects]
Devi Nonp 551,160 [<unknown> - Device objects]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- From: Dan Davis
- RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- References:
- RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- From: Dan Davis
- RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- Prev by Date: RE: Setting up NFS shares
- Next by Date: RE: Setting up NFS shares
- Previous by thread: RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- Next by thread: RE: KB913648 Volume Shadow Copy Service update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|