Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I.can@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:22:44 +1100
You omitted the most important bit: The output from the
net share command!
"John Smith" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23DKX2ylRGHA.792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here is the output for net user:most
User name test
Full Name test
Comment
User's comment
Country code 000 (System Default)
Account active Yes
Account expires Never
Password last set 3/12/2006 8:58 PM
Password expires Never
Password changeable 3/12/2006 8:58 PM
Password required Yes
User may change password Yes
Workstations allowed All
Logon script
User profile
Home directory
Last logon 3/12/2006 5:15 PM
Logon hours allowed All
Local Group Memberships
Global Group memberships *Domain Users
The command completed successfully.
here is the output for cacls:
c:\admin tools\Engineering BORREROFAMILY\oborrero:(OI)(CI)F
BORREROFAMILY\test:(OI)(CI)F
and here is the output for netshare:
Share name Engineering
Path C:\Admin Tools\Engineering
Remark Testing Permissions
Maximum users 10
Users
Caching Manual caching of documents
Permission BORREROFAMILY\test, READ
The command completed successfully.
"Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OTtdhOlRGHA.3052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Let's have a look at your settings! Start a command prompt
on your server and type these commands:
net share xxx > c:\test.txt
cacls "d:\Shares\yyy" >> c:\test.txt
net user %UserName% >> c:\test.txt
Replace xxx with the name of your problem share and
d:\Shares\yyy with the path to that share. Now paste
the contents of c:\test.txt into your reply!
Note that the "net share" command will return permission information
under Windows 2003 only but not under other versions of Windows.
"John Smith" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O736j4kRGHA.4920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
it also says that, but i just wanted to see if they really apply the
i'mrestrictive permissions when you combine them. it's not doing it, so
securityjust tryin to get it to runLevel
"Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:epw3xPkRGHA.4976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"John Smith" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OQQK91jRGHA.5924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I'm attempting to do my lab but i've run into a problem with Share
Fileand
NTFS File permissions.
Here's my setup
1. One domain, with one domain controller that hosts DNS, DHCP, and
conjunctionServer Services (Contoso.Com).
1. One XP PRO SP2 Client Machine
Now the book says, "Share level permissions should be used in
with NTFS permisssions, not instead of them. The 2 levels of
themorework
together. Users who access the share will have a combination of the
restrictive permissions that have been set."the
I setup my Test user account with a share level permission of Read,
and
NTFS file permission FUll Control. When i login to my domain from
XP
InheritancePro
client, and access the resource i'm still able to delete, and change
anything in the folder when i should only be allowed to read.
is
setup properly, but the effective permissions show FULL Control forresource
that i'm trying to access for the test user account. What am i doing
wrong
??
I don't know what book you quote but most sysadmins will
set the share permissions to "Full Control" for everyone and
set appropriate NTFS permissions. I see no advantage in
having two permission schemes that will possibly contradict
each other. Furthermore, NTFS permissions are so much more
powerful than share permissions!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: John Smith
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- References:
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: John Smith
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: John Smith
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Prev by Date: Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Next by Date: Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Previous by thread: Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Next by thread: Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|