Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I.can@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:15:03 +1100
"John Smith" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OQQK91jRGHA.5924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,and
I'm attempting to do my lab but i've run into a problem with Share Level
NTFS File permissions.the
Here's my setup
1. One domain, with one domain controller that hosts DNS, DHCP, and File
Server Services (Contoso.Com).
1. One XP PRO SP2 Client Machine
Now the book says, "Share level permissions should be used in conjunction
with NTFS permisssions, not instead of them. The 2 levels of security work
together. Users who access the share will have a combination of the more
restrictive permissions that have been set."
I setup my Test user account with a share level permission of Read, and
NTFS file permission FUll Control. When i login to my domain from the XPPro
client, and access the resource i'm still able to delete, and changeis
anything in the folder when i should only be allowed to read. Inheritance
setup properly, but the effective permissions show FULL Control forresource
that i'm trying to access for the test user account. What am i doing wrong
??
I don't know what book you quote but most sysadmins will
set the share permissions to "Full Control" for everyone and
set appropriate NTFS permissions. I see no advantage in
having two permission schemes that will possibly contradict
each other. Furthermore, NTFS permissions are so much more
powerful than share permissions!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: Jason Tan (MSFT)
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- From: John Smith
- Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Prev by Date: Re: Unable to delete a fil - very strange
- Next by Date: Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Previous by thread: Re: Unable to delete a fil - very strange
- Next by thread: Re: share level & ntfs permissions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|