Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: "Shenan Stanley" <newshelper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:03:15 -0500
Shenan Stanley wrote:
<snip>
No - XP's firewall sucks bilgewater.<snip>
I will rephrase that - for clarity..
(I may have cut it short for emphasis. hah)
XP's firewall would not hold water in comparison to other full featured
firewalls.
My biggest complaint - one-way protection.
For the home user - it provides adequate protection, especially if used in
conjunction with a NAT device.
Also - for the home user - it is already configured and easy to manage.
Many a home user has tried other full-featured firewalls and been
overwhelmed.
If all you want is general firewall protection - the Windows XP Firewall is
"fine".
If you want more protection (or need more protection) - you should look into
the other products.
In a layered environment - where the Windows Firewall is the "last line of
defense after other better products" - it also does its job nicely.
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
.
- References:
- A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: ljh
- Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: Shenan Stanley
- Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: ljh
- Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: Shenan Stanley
- Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: ljh
- Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- From: Shenan Stanley
- A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- Prev by Date: Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- Next by Date: Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- Previous by thread: Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- Next by thread: Re: A FREE, EASIER alternative to Remote Desktop....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|