Re: Security question

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



I tried the port scan. It passed (full stealth status), even when I
probed port 3389 explicitly and even when I was logged on to the other
computer using Remote Desktop. I would conclude that my configuration
is safe.

It seems that Remote Desktop requires some kind of password no matter
what the configuration. It refused to connect due to an "account
restriction" until I defined a password on the host computer.


On Thu, 12 May 2005 14:20:42 GMT, "Fitz" <SENDNOMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>If you want both computers to be able to access each other from behind the
>router (inside your local network), the you have the appropriate ports open
>on your router to allow the two computers to do this. Once the ports are
>open, then anyone (inside or outside the local network) can run a port scan
>and determine if there is a computer listening on a particular port, e.g.
>port 3389 (Remote Desktop).
>
>Unless you disable internet access for your two computers, then yes, there
>is a danger. Your router firewall is nice (most routers use one) but it's
>not a silver bullet. Run a port scan at www.grc.com to see how easy it is.
>
>
>"Cliff Lewis" <clewis@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:c7g68111vrbi8msnlpeu5mjb5rc9n071q0@xxxxxxxxxx
>>I have two computers at home. I want to use Remote Desktop to access
>> one computer from the other while the video card is being shipped to
>> the factory for warranty replacement. They share a connection to the
>> Internet through a router, which has a firewall. Am I correct in
>> believing that there is no security risk from outside? The only way
>> there could be is if Remote Desktop somehow allowed access through the
>> router's firewall.
>>
>> On Wed, 11 May 2005 19:57:31 -0500, "Sooner Al [MVP]"
>> <SoonerAl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>If you access/control your PC from a remote location and do not use a
>>>password to login then your
>>>opening up your PC to a potential and probable security risk. I suggest
>>>you always use a strong
>>>password...
>>
>

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Routers Firewall
    ... I ask him do you have a firewall and he says yes. ... I still have an IDS/firewall on all my machines behind the router. ... > to connect to a port your public IP address the router would reject the ... > An open port on the router could be connected to a service running on the ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Possible Mail Relay or just new usages of returned mail by spammers
    ... If you have ANY type of firewall, be it a NAT router or true firewall ... ISA can be used in conjunction with the router/firewall, but if you do, you ... to be done twice...once in ISA, and once in the router to port forward to ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Home firewall Hits
    ... >Port 162 with a UDP message. ... than theres nothing blocking access from the internet to your router. ... >Subject: Home firewall Hits ... >simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: More on Remote Desktop
    ... I still won't be opening up a port on my firewall for it, ... The Remote Desktop ... > Yes a VPN will work just fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: XP to Vista Remote Assistance.
    ... Have the Vista end turn off the NLA requirement for Remote Desktop. ... RA on XP listened on the regular RDP port so that all the ... firewall and to the machine. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)