Re: Remote Desktop Control thru VPN, did work! Not now (sigh)...

From: Bill Sanderson (Bill_Sanderson_at_msn.com.plugh.org)
Date: 02/12/04


Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:09:37 -0500

Pick whichever end of the link is easiest to change--perhaps your end, for
now, and change the subnet to a different one: Say, 192.168.2.x

"Doc" <pc-dc-doc@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:uubwu2W8DHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Bill Sanderson typed this:
>> Are the addresses at the far end of the VPN tunnel on the same subnet as
>> those on your end?
>
> Absolutely! Private Scheme - 192.168.0.xxx / the subnets on both LANS are
> default
>
>> If your target host machine is the one terminating the VPN tunnel, I'd go
>> for whatever IP address is specified in the VPN connectoid (down by the
>> clock, status, details) as the "server ip address."
>
> Yes... that is right and what I am using.
>
>
>> You've got the right instinct--you want a single pipe to put you on the
>> lan at the far end, able to address any given machine with RD--and this
>> should be possible, if you can get the IP addressing right.
>
> I'm hoping I can get it running. As I mentioned, can VPN by itself. Can
> Remote Desktop by itself, can't mix 'em. Think this could be MTU?????
>
>
>> Since this is all private addressing we are talking about (if not, why
>> not just leave off the last part if the addresses)--it'd be easier for me
>> to visualize if you could just tell us straight out what the addresses
>> are--those given out by DHCP at the host end, those you've specied for
>> the VPN use at the host end, and those in use at the client end--and
>> those that actually appear in properties of the tunnel when it's open.
>
> Sure the "client" or controlling PC is 192.168.0.XXX
> The "host" or server PC is 192.168.0.xxx
> The 'VPN' provided addresses are not DHCP selected, but manually
> entered and DO show up in the 'connectoid' in the lower right , both
> are Class C, private scheme (192.168.0.x - and NONE of the provided
> VPN IP addresses are IN USE at either end - but I AM double checking
> that!)...
>
> Many thanks... head has big bruise from beating it against the wall. If
> I come up with the answers it will be posted here. Thanks again.
>
>
>
>>>It was going so well...
>>>I've been able to setup VPN.
>>>I've been able to setup Remote Desktop Connections
>>>I've been (at one location) able to 'tunnel' the RDC thru the VPN.
>>>
>>>BUT another SITE is giving me fits. I can VPN and get connected.
>>>I can Remote Desktop Connect and have full control over the desktop
>>>behind the Netgear RP614v2 -
>>>With VPN, I've port forwarded to the defualt PORT (1723, although in
>>>the Netgear it is a preconfigured PPTP setting - but it works as VPN
>>>and I connect VPN from the remote computer instantly.
>>>
>>>UNLIKE the other setup, I CANNOT gain remote control over the desktop
>>>thru the VPN. I can get RDC to work by just bypassing VPN and opening
>>>the default port (but I will be RDC to three others and I wanted to
>>>just come thru the ONE PIPE, VPN_)...
>>>
>>>Perhaps I don't understand the TWO in combo (and it was just dumb
>>>luck that got the first one running at a different location)...
>>>I've followed the VPN client and server setup and it works.
>>>I've setup the 'server' (in the VPN chain) to "AlLOW REMOTE DESKTOP
>>>CONTROL" and used a single USER (who, BTW, is the same NAMED user
>>>and SAME given P/W as the user at the "client" end of the VPN tunnel)
>>>
>>>The Remote Desktop Connection efforts are just not connecting.
>>>I have entered several different IP addresses (in an attempt to
>>>see if ANYTHING will connect)...
>>>I initially used ONE of the ASSIGNED IP addresses that I name in
>>>the 'server side' setup for VPN - they are the same class exactly
>>>as the 'server' side LAN and, being private, the same CLASS SCHEME
>>>as the DHCP assigned 'client' IP address (provided by that end's
>>>ISP setup of that Modem/router - it is using DHCP and only three
>>>IPs are leased out). All thru the VPN, no VPN? Works nicely thru 3389.
>>>
>>>I could not connect. So tried the IP address of the "server" PC as
>>>it IS given in that LOCAL LAN - no go.
>>>I tried the OTHER (called the Client IP) address provided in the
>>>VPN server setup, no go.
>>>
>>>I did even try the IP address (static) of the WAN side of the
>>>MODEM/Router (I know, I know) and it wouldn't go.
>>>
>>>Any help is GREATLY appreciated..
>>>Thanks.
>>>--
>>>Rich "Doc" Colley
>>>
>>>mailto: pc-dc-doc@nospam.comcast.net
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rich "Doc" Colley
>
> mailto: pc-dc-doc@nospam.comcast.net



Relevant Pages

  • Re: VPN and Routing in one box
    ... Any suggestions for a simple router that will do this? ... Packets originate in Subnet 1, ... The VPN is the first hop. ... should be sent through the VPN gateway at 192.168.2.0 and you ...
    (comp.dcom.vpn)
  • Re: VPN and Routing in one box
    ... Packets originate in Subnet 1, ... The VPN is the first hop. ... When packets arrive via the VPN at Subnet 2, they have to be routed to a particular router / IP address on Subnet 2, which is the next hop in order to be futher routed to Subnet 3. ...
    (comp.dcom.vpn)
  • Win2k Ras/VPN and a SCO Unix Machine and some difficulty getting to the SCO Machine [LONG]
    ... Unix 5.0.7 system in conjunction with a Win2k System providing VPN access. ... The bulk of their processing is done via dumb terminal connections but they ... LAN but they are on the same subnet. ... The entire network is currently setup to run on the 192.168.1. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: VPN Issue
    ... I have read some articles about this subnet issue, so I know what you mean. ... I then connect to my network using the VPN connectoid. ... a new network adapter in the client directly to one in the server. ... But ONLY if I add in the domain.local DNS suffix to the VPN connection. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Win2k Ras/VPN and a SCO Unix Machine and some difficulty getting to the SCO Machine [LONG]
    ... Win2k System providing VPN access. ... DNS functions. ... WAN and one as LAN but they are on the same subnet (as you will ... Box anyways) but our access to the SCO Unix box will fail while ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)