Re: Move to XP Pro 64
- From: "DL" <address@invalid>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:54:41 +0100
Cannot say I've noticed any difference
"Mario Schmidt" <mario.schmidt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f1d8am$km7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DL schrieb:a
And as to whether your software could take advantage of win64bit.
I dont believe either dreamweaver or Office2003 can in any case utilise
dual core cpu (both cores)
That's true. Most home-used software which supports more than one core
are compression utilities (e.g. winrar) and video compression.
Still, with more than one core, multitasking alone is a lot more
"smooth". Transitioning between programs goes faster and more stable.
And, if it's an AMD Athlon X2 EE, you even save some energy!
.
- References:
- Move to XP Pro 64
- From: Erich93063
- Re: Move to XP Pro 64
- From: DL
- Re: Move to XP Pro 64
- From: Mario Schmidt
- Move to XP Pro 64
- Prev by Date: Re: Blue screen
- Next by Date: Re: How to Make WinXP Boot Drive C:
- Previous by thread: Re: Move to XP Pro 64
- Next by thread: Profile Issue
- Index(es):