Re: Dual Booting Windows XP
From: Pegasus \(MVP\) (I.can_at_fly.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Mark: "Can't boot up xp Home"
- Previous message: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Copying a profile"
- In reply to: Jim: "Re: Dual Booting Windows XP"
- Next in thread: Jim: "Re: Dual Booting Windows XP"
- Reply: Jim: "Re: Dual Booting Windows XP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:06:33 +1000
XOSL is a free product and is therefore not supported. However,
it has its own highly responsive newsgroup.
About its updates (or otherwise): XOSL seems to offer all the
facilities you could want for a boot manager, beating many
other products by a long shot, so why update it?
About BootIT: Can it boot into a WinXP installation that
resides in a logical drive, complete with its boot files?
XOSL can! What about if the WinXP installation resides
on the secondary slave drive?
"Jim" <null@null.com> wrote in message news:M7Xjc.952$ph.144@fed1read07...
> RE: XOSL, the only issue I have w/ this product is that it has not been
very
> well supported over the past few years, last time I checked, it hadn't
been
> updated in several years (its not even hosting by http://www.xosl.org
> anymore, its long time home). Don't get me wrong, I've used it the past,
it
> worked fine last time I used it (circa 2000), but this is one caveat that
> would concern me.
>
> My preference is BootIt NG ( http://www.bootitng.com ). This is very well
> supported, continually updated and enhanced, has its own NGs, provides
> partition management and imaging too. I was a prior user of Partition
> Manager and Drive Image, which I've since replaced w/ BootIt NG (about 4
> years ago). Just no need for these other tools anynore (for me anyway).
>
> As far as the primaries issues, you have to realize that these VERY large
> HDs are a relatively recent phenomenon, certainly far more recent than the
> semantics that rule the DOS-based geometry of your HD. I also believe the
> use of additional primaries wasn't to support multi-booting, initially,
but
> simply finer control over partitioning for a single OS. IOW,
multi-booting
> issues/concerns/limitations became what they are because these were
> afterthoughts (afterall, the first time I can even recall multi-booting an
> MS OS was Win 3.11 and the then-new NT 3.1 around 1993, again, well after
> the all these semantics were well in place).
>
> FYI, I have had no problems booting XP from numerous locations on the HD,
as
> yet, I've found no restrictions on where it can be loaded from. It seems
> whatever restrictions that preceeded it w/ Win98, WinNT, etc., have been
> eliminated or at least are much less stringent. I've cloned my
installation
> numerous times and booted w/o problems, and while I didn't test *every*
> possible HD location, I have been up and down my 120GB HD considerably.
So
> I don't think you'll have any real issues here as far as XP. If you want
to
> multi-boot Win98, WinNT, etc, as well, then yes, place these near the head
> of the HD, the older, the closer to the head they should be for maximum
> compatibility.
>
> One additional feature of BootIt NG I love is "unlimited primaries". This
> makes it possible to have (essentially) unlimited clones of your OS! I
> don't even use an extended partition (w/ logical partitions) anymore
because
> of this feature. You are still restricted to four primaries (or three
> primaries + 1 extended partition) at *runtime*, but for definitional
> purposes, the restriction is lifted, I typically have 15-20 partitions
> defined on my HD at any given moment, including MS-DOS 6.22, MS-DOS 7.1,
> Win98, XP, W2K, several XP snapshots (images made w/ BootItNG), several
DATA
> partitions, etc. And all the OS's load as C:, which avoids a ton of
> problems compared to the MS boot loader (makes cloning a trival exercise).
> Works great.
>
> HTH
>
> Jim
>
>
> "Less Than 0" <glassjawslipknot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e5ccec3.0404281329.49923334@posting.google.com...
> > Alright, I have a simple problem. Well probably not so simple since i
> > cant seem to figure it out. I have XP Images. I want to put more than
> > one on a hard drive. I then want to be able to choose which one boots
> > when i start the computer. I apply the first image. Use Partition
> > Magic 7 to resize it to about 10 gigs. Then i use PM7 to create
> > another primary partition. I apply the second image. Goes on great.
> > But i can only boot to the first image. I have read that you have to
> > have both your OS's below 8GB to be bootable so i am going to try
> > this next. If it works then i suppose my problem is solved. So my
> > question is, is there a way around this? What was the point of saying
> > you can create 4 primary partitions, yet you cant boot from them past
> > 8GB? Seems like a waste to me, especially with the size of drives now
> > days. Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
- Next message: Mark: "Can't boot up xp Home"
- Previous message: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Copying a profile"
- In reply to: Jim: "Re: Dual Booting Windows XP"
- Next in thread: Jim: "Re: Dual Booting Windows XP"
- Reply: Jim: "Re: Dual Booting Windows XP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|