Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro
From: Jim (null_at_null.com)
Date: 03/28/04
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Time Out on Installation"
- In reply to: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro"
- Next in thread: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro"
- Reply: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:05:04 -0800
RE: FAT32 being limited to 32GB
You can't create a FAT32 >32GB in XP, but you can use other utilities, such
as BootIt NG, Partition Magic, etc., to create >32GB, and XP will happily
read and write to it.
Jim
"Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can@fly.com> wrote in message
news:uO%23GrhEFEHA.4080@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "A Colwood" <ac@nbco.nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:OQyXWcDFEHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to install Win XP Pro on a system presently running Win ME. I
> > would appreciate if anyone can advise me about partioning a large HD in
> XP.
> >
> > My current arrangement is as follows:
> >
> > Drive 0: Maxtor 120GB
> >
> > C: 18GB Windows and application programs
> > D: 2GB Windows swap file
> > E: 50GB Data
> > F: 50GB Data
> >
> > Drive 1: Seagate 20GB
> >
> > G: 20GB Backup files
> >
> > (The swap file is on a partition on drive 0 because I figured it is
still
> > faster than putting it on drive 1 which is older and slower.)
> >
> > All partitions are FAT32. The system has 512MB of memory and the swap
file
> > is set to a minimum size of 512MB. (It only really uses much swap file
> when
> > I'm really pushing the system with PhotoShop and GoLive.)
> >
> > The Microsoft site recommends partitioning as one huge NTFS volume which
I
> > don't really like the idea of. MS also suggests that the paging file in
XP
> > should be on the same partition as the OS for efficiency.
> >
> > Would a sensible compromise be to combine the C: & D: partitions as a
> single
> > NTFS volume for the OS and page/swap file and application programs and
> keep
> > my separate Data partitions?
> >
> > Also, should E: & F: be converted to NTFS or can they be left as FAT32?
> >
> > I hope I haven't been too long winded with this query.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> >
> > --
> > Antony Colwood
> >
> >
>
> I would never run a system with just one single partition.
> At the very least I would do this:
> - Drive C: Operating system, Applications
> - Drive D: Data
>
> In some cases, extra partitions may be required.
>
> WinXP will happily run with FAT32 and NTFS partitions.
> The differences are:
> - FAT32: No security, easier to access when things go wrong.
> - NTFS: Good security, hard to deal with when problems arise.
>
> I seem to recall that FAT32 partitions are limited to 32 GBytes
> but I'm no sure if this applies to WinXP.
>
> In spite of what other posters say, NTFS is slower than FAT32.
> For folders up to around 2000 files, the difference is barely
> noticeable. When accessing large folders (10,000 files), NTFS
> runs at around half the speed of FAT32.
>
>
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Time Out on Installation"
- In reply to: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro"
- Next in thread: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro"
- Reply: Pegasus \(MVP\): "Re: Advice needed on partioning HD for XPPro"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|