Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- From: "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" <russval@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:47:06 -0500
It's even worse than that.
Let's say, for example, that you wanted to do a mail merge to fax. In that
case, international format for phone numbers will not work. Instead the fax
numbers have to be in one-off format [FAX:nnnnnnn].
FWIW, international format has been a requirement for processing dialing
rules forever, so at least it's consistent. And it is a simple matter to
configure Outlook to add country codes automatically when you enter phone
numbers.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Mike" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112883199.820196.304450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I could not believe what difficulty I had trying to fax a Word document
> using Microsoft's Fax driver! I am a 20+ year programmer, so can only
> imagine the frustration and wasted time of less technical folks as they
> try to diagnose why their attempts to fax using Windows XP and Outlook
> fail.
>
> Long story made short: Using XP Professional, I enter all my Outlook
> 2003 contacts using a number format like 111-222-3333. Outlook then
> reformats it to (111) 222-3333. Great, so Outlook "pretties" up the
> format for us automatically. Then I try to send a fax from Word 2003
> using the Microsoft Fax "wizard". I checked off the box to "Use Dialing
> Rules", which I thought would end up inserting a 1 before the (111)
> 222-3333 since my 111 number was NOT in my local area code. WRONG - it
> does NOT dial the 1 required for making long distance calls in all the
> USA! Through some magical osmosis, you have to "know" to enter your
> Outlook/Address Book phone numbers in what Microsoft calls "canonical
> format", so instead of entering 111-222-3333 in my Outlook contact's
> fax field, I have to enter the absurd format of +1 (111) 222-3333.
> Whatever Microsoft engineer came up with this system should be shot :)
> I guarantee that if we surveyed 100 people, not one of them would know
> what "canonical" means! Now get this Microsoft logic: On the Send Fax
> Wizard - Recipient Information screen if you *manually* enter the Fax
> Number(e.g. 111-222-3333), then the wizard DOES insert a 1 for you
> before the area code. Why are we penalized for using the address
> book????
>
> Come on Microsoft, make your fax and dialing software intelligent, and
> CONSISTENT. Why isn't there a setting in the Area Code Rules to
> address this? How come manually entered fax nos do get the 1 prefix
> added? Where does that "intelligence" come from?
>
> In the mean time, I hope Microsoft enjoys all the confusion this must
> be causing users :)
>
> I am always amazed at how Microsoft gets 99% of things right, but the
> 1% "wrong" include some real winners - like long distance dialing...
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- From: Mike
- Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- From: Mike
- Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- From: Mike
- Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- From: Dennis M. Marks
- Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Fax sharing without server
- Next by Date: Re: Printers unavailable since upgrading to XP SP2
- Previous by thread: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- Next by thread: Re: Requirement to enter fax nos for Outlook contacts in "canonical" format - absurd!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading