Re: digital camera


"smlunatick" <yveslec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:95af875e-da55-4f42-b19f-1d8f27ce928e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 28, 1:33 am, "Edward W. Thompson" <thomed...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Anteaus" <Ante...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:7EA1FA17-CAF3-4DBD-BFF8-67B535043924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

If the camera uses a memory card, then a few dollars will get you a
cardreader. Put the card in and it becomes a driveletter, perhaps E:
which
you can copy files to and from. Far better way of working.

"bhall" wrote:

When I plug in my digital camera nothing happens,

Why better? Simply a more expensive alternative.

Not completely. If the digital camera does not have any XP drivers,
the the card reader would be "cheaper" than replacing the camera.

Agreed, but surely all digital cameras these days have WINXP drivers. If
not I would be surprised they would be 'saleable'. Seems a stretch to think
anyone would buy a digital camera without the means to retrieve the images
included.


.

Relevant Pages