Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- From: "Jim" <j.n@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:27:57 GMT
"Hugo Trebl" <singalong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148589209.943671.82760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi allQuit wasting time with a soon to be history disk. Replace the bloody thing
got some bad sectors on a hard drive recently.
Most things are backed up, but, as usual, not everything in the most
recent version.
I attempted to relocate the data in the damaged sectors with Spinrite,
which reported some partial success.
I also cloned the disc in case further sectors go bad.
Now the NTFS file system is naturally still damaged. What steps should
I take to fix it?
while you can still read some of the data.
Jim
Is chkdsk /r my best choice or is there a better tool?
My main concern is finding out which files are most likely corrupted,
and my second concern to recover what is salvageable.
chkdsk (whitout /r) finds several errors, but reports mainly file
numbers and file segment numbers, so is not very helpful in the first
respect. I don't know how good it is in the second.
Any other options?
thanks for your help.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- From: Hugo Trebl
- Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- References:
- repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- From: Hugo Trebl
- repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Prev by Date: Re: Switching off Automatic updates permanently
- Next by Date: Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Previous by thread: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Next by thread: Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|