Re: CPU usage.
- From: "J" <nope@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:38:19 +0100
Thanks. I'll have a try. If that wasn't the problem I'm back to square one.
:(
"Peter" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eWHGYxzTFHA.2420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 55 for me would be pretty normal. There's a program out there that is
> useful for many things, including what's active in your PC.
> Download Winpatrol here: http://www.winpatrol.com/winpatrol.html
> It has "Plus" paid version which gives even more info.
>
> --
> Peter
> Toronto, Canada
> XP Home SP2
> P4 dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 1.0gb RAM, 160gb HD
> "J" <nope@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eeGVOozTFHA.2520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi all.
>> I use an excellent graphics program which runs slow and after checking
>> that it's not my memory, space, spyware or virus issues, it may be that
>> I need to get a new graphics card that will blast more.
>> Before that though it was also suggested that I may have too many
>> programs running in the background. I've minimised my start-up list to
>> just antivirus and firewall and bare Window essentials.
>> But when I go to task manager to processes, there seems to be way too
>> much stuff there. 55 and most I don't recognise.
>> Is there a way of finding out what these are. Or at best finding out what
>> XP needs to have so I can stop process on the others.
>> Thanks.
>> J
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CPU usage.
- From: Peter
- Re: CPU usage.
- References:
- CPU usage.
- From: J
- Re: CPU usage.
- From: Peter
- CPU usage.
- Prev by Date: Re: CPU usage.
- Next by Date: Re: CPU usage.
- Previous by thread: Re: CPU usage.
- Next by thread: Re: CPU usage.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|