Re: Performance measurement
From: Carey Frisch [MVP] (cnfrisch_at_nospamgmail.com)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: Windows XP SP2- which processes are essential?"
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "shut down"
- In reply to: Columbo: "Performance measurement"
- Next in thread: Columbo: "Re: Performance measurement"
- Reply: Columbo: "Re: Performance measurement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:24:10 -0500
Visit www.pcpitstop.com
-- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User Be Smart! Protect Your PC! http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/default.aspx --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Columbo" wrote: | Hi, | | I was wondering, is there a programme for measuring WindowsXP | performance/speed? | | What I mean by this is that I believe some of the benchmarking | programmes (PCMark04 etc) are designed to test hardware performance | (??) and as such they may just hog the processor for the period of the | test as it does not want to know about how the PC software influences | performance... or am I wrong? | | Perhaps a better way to describe what i want to achieve is to describe | it like this.... OK, your PC is running slow and you know it's due to | all the usual junk/spyware so on and so forth.... so you go ahead and | clean out all the rubbish and you notice that there is an improvement | in performance which is great... However what I would like to do is to | quantify that improvement, i.e. performance is boosted by 20%.. | | does that make sense? or am i talking rubbish too? :-) | | Thanks, | CB
- Next message: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: Windows XP SP2- which processes are essential?"
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "shut down"
- In reply to: Columbo: "Performance measurement"
- Next in thread: Columbo: "Re: Performance measurement"
- Reply: Columbo: "Re: Performance measurement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
