Re: Reserved Files and Defragmentation

From: Wesley Vogel (123WVogel955_at_comcast.net)
Date: 05/10/04


Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:49:05 GMT

Andrew;

Have a look here:

Files That You Cannot Defragment
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/reskit/en-us/prkd_tro_ldtg.asp

PageDefrag
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/pagedefrag.shtml

-- 
Hope this helps.  Let us know.
Wes
In news:VA.00000033.01065d64@btinternet.com,
Andrew Borland <newsmonger@btinternet.com>  hunted and pecked:
> Help,
>
> I'm trying to get a grip on defragmentation issues for my NTFS
> formatted C:\ Drive under windows XP-Pro SP1.  This is still a
> development installation so dangerous experiments are permitted.
>
> I have installed the demo versions of both Disk Keeper 8 and Perfect
> Disk 4 for evaluation.
>
> In each tool, there appear to be a number of "system files" scattered
> about on the disk which the tool is unable/unwilling to move, along
> with a huge chunk on each disk labelled "reserved/mft".  These combine
> to greatly reduce the amount of contiguous free space - thus
> preventing optimisation of the pagefile.sys and/or hiberfil.sys files.
>
> Partition is 16G, Pagefile is 4G and Hiberfil is 2G.  8G is free.
> RAM is 2G.
>
> I have managed to achieve a degree of defragmentation by disabling
> virtual memory and hibernation and then deleting and recreating the
> associated monster files, but this isn't something I would want to do
> more than once.  Even then, I still failed to achieve a truly
> contiguous result on account of those unmovable bits.
>
> Is there a recognised bible (novice level) on how XP manages its
> disks, and how best to build a system with good solid contiguous
> monster files?
>
> How would the experts here suggest that I tackle the problem?  I can't
> believe I'm the first to go down this road, but I don't see anything
> much in the archives.
>
> Historical note.  Under windows 98 I use Norton SpeedDisk which
> appears to be able and willing to move smaller files (even if not
> fragmented) to one end of a partition to lave a large contiguous
> space at the other end into which it packs the swapfile.  Finally the
> disk was left with no gaps between files.  Are there good technical
> reasons why this cannot be done under NTFS?
>
> Regards,  Andrew Borland (UK)


Relevant Pages

  • Re: disk defragmentation
    ... with 80% free disk space should not be creating difficulties. ... In ScanDefrag, I also set the option for "Page ... periodical defragmentation, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Long load time for documents
    ... detect and repair. ... Then clean up your PC, I would recommend you to run some anti spy SW, ... You might also consider to run defragmentation of your HDD. ... And have a look at your hard disk: if it's over 80 per cent full, ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: iDefrag program in Leopard
    ... Re: Adaptive hot-file clustering: ... Frequently read but rarely changed "small" files are moved to the fasted part of the hard disk ... If your disks are almost full, and you often modify or create large files (such as editing video, but see the Tip below if you use iMovie and Mac OS X 10.3), there's a chance the disks could be fragmented. ... In this case, you might benefit from defragmentation, which can be performed with some third-party disk utilities. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: iDefrag program in Leopard
    ... moved to contiguous disk space" ... (such as editing video, but see the Tip below if you use iMovie and Mac OS X ... In some situations, OS X can benefit from defragmentation, even Apple admits ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: defragmenting
    ... be regular with the disk cleanup and defrag..coz if u need ... to have any improvement thru defrag, you need contiguous free space. ... storage devices (music files, photos etc).Run disk error check before ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)