Re: Paging File
- From: "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:30:42 -0700
Jerry wrote:
Did you consider increasing the RAM? 256Mb is barely enough for XP -
1Mb is better.
I assume you mean 1GB, not 1MB.
1GB might be better for some people, but not everyone. It is more than most
people can make effective use of. How much RAM you need for good peformance
is *not* a one-size-fits-all situation. You get good performance if the
amount of RAM you have keeps you from using the page file, and that depends
on what apps you run. Most people running a typical range of business
applications find that somewhere around 256-384MB works well, others need
512MB. Almost anyone will see poor performance with less than 256MB. Some
people, particularly those doing things like editing large photographic
images, can see a performance boost by adding even more than
512MB--sometimes much more.
If you are currently using the page file significantly, more memory will
decrease or eliminate that usage, and improve your performance. If you are
not using the page file significantly, more memory will do nothing for you.
Go to http://billsway.com/notes%5Fpublic/winxp%5Ftweaks/ and download
WinXP-2K_Pagefile.zip and monitor your pagefile usage. That should give you
a good idea of whether more memory can help, and if so, how much more.
--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
.
- References:
- Re: Paging File
- From: Jerry
- Re: Paging File
- Prev by Date: Re: Virtual Memory Size
- Next by Date: Re: Paging File
- Previous by thread: Re: Paging File
- Next by thread: Re: Paging File
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|