Re: Re: worthless activation
- From: Sparda <UseLinkToEmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jul 2005 19:35:52 -0400
"" wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2005 20:35:36 -0400, Sparda
> <UseLinkToEmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >"" wrote:
> > > "Guy" is full of beans....
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carey Frisch
> > > Microsoft MVP
> > > Windows XP - Shell/User
> > > Microsoft Newsgroups
> > >
> > > Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security
> > > Technologies:
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/windowsxp/choose.mspx
> > >
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -----------------------------
> > >
> > > "Husky" wrote:
> > >
> > > | Guy says he does it with a registered version. I want to
> > > know how...
> >
> >Hello, I havent been keeping track, but i use reset5.02 to
> disable the
> >activation, this dose only work upto service pack1, but i
> donâ??t
> >intend on upgrading to SP2, if it works, then why upgrade,
> lots of
> >compnays (infect the majority) still use windows 2000 with
> win 2k
> >servers, whats the point upgrading if it alredy works. Plus
> from past
> >experiance i have discovered that upgrading from one SP to
> another
> >causes general instability and anoyance, alot of the updates
> that MS
> >provide (including SP2) just have a feel good factor "I have
> all
> >updates... My PC must be secure". Obviusly this is not so,
> and as such
> >i am behind a hardware firewall and ontop of that run a
> personal
> >firewall (ZA Pro to be exact) along side spybot S & D and
> AntiVir
> >(compleat with automated internal update server), basicly i
> refer you
> >back to "if it works, why upgrade?"
>
> Why upgrade from win 3.01 ? Because you'll get trampled in the
> advancing
> technology is why if you don't..
> And SP2 is a big improvement.
> --
> more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html
Service Pack 2 is a big improvment on Win 3.01? I dare say it is, but
there igo agian been pedantic. Obviusly win 3.01 can be said not to
work becasue it wouldnt not do what i requier, which is play DirecX 9
games. You may now wonder why I use XP over 98 or even XP over 2000,
well, im not sure why i use xp over 2000, there is no reason why i
should (guess this gose back to most companys using win 2000) I could
do every thing I wanted to do on windows 2000, the reasons for xp over
98 are fairly obviuse, 1. More stable 2. NTFS support 3. Back ground
services act more like deamons 4. Some recent games (such as san
andras) wont work on 98. What do you mean service pack instalments go
smoothly? of course they apar to install smoothly, untill you
disccover your printer prints all letters as question marks and
windows thinks you have DirecX 7 installed.
--
Posted using the http://www.windowsforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.windowsforumz.com/New-Users-worthless-activation-ftopict396721.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.windowsforumz.com/eform.php?p=1314704
.
- References:
- Re: worthless activation
- From: Husky
- Re: worthless activation
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Re: worthless activation
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Major Help on XP!
- Previous by thread: Re: worthless activation
- Next by thread: Re: worthless activation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
