Re: Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- From: "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <lanwench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:07:27 -0400
MattNeedsHelpPlease <MattNeedsHelpPlease@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
So, we have a number of remote offices that currently map a drive
back to the main office server over slower WAN links (2-3Mbit or
less). It is a fact that the CIFS protocol does not work well over a
WAN connection and mapping drives uses network overhead. So we could
use a shortcut on the users desktop to the UNC path i.e.
\\servername\share.
My question is:
Is it better for network purposes to use a shortcut to a UNC path or a
mapped drive?
I personally prefer mapped drives, as they're easier for users to remember,
and allow you to switch/move stuff around on the servers without users ever
noticing it. Are you having problems with the current setup? Local file
servers & DFS, or terminal services in the main office, may be a better way
to go.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- From: Robert L. \(MS-MVP\)
- Re: Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- References:
- Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- From: MattNeedsHelpPlease
- Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- Prev by Date: Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- Next by Date: Re: printer sharing using windows xp
- Previous by thread: Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- Next by thread: Re: Mapped drive vs. shortcut to folder
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|