Re: Intermitant XP Network Problems



On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:50:19 -0400, "Andy" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:odml321mtf6j6ckeraemqp4fmh0i6clddn@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:47:39 -0400, "Andy" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3pbl32lmga63rm10a4937cqkp5255tcd2i@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:58:40 -0700, "AndyR" <> wrote:

If this isn't posted to the correct group, please let me know...

I have a Win2K domain server that 2 XP Pro PC's log into. Both XP
machines
log in
fine, and can see each other while brosing the network. I have a test
SQL
Server
database on one of the XP PC's (#1), which I would like the other XP PC
(#2) to see.
The problem is that #2 intermitantly loses it's connection(s) to #1.
This
isn't a SQL
problem -- because when this happens, #2 also loses its mapped drives to
#1. It can
still see the name in Network Places -- but when it double-clicks on the
name, it gets
the error "<ServerName> is not accessible. You might not have permission
to use this
network resource."

Very rarely, #2 will reconnect to #1 after some delay (minutes or
hours).
But usually the
only way I have been able to get reconnected again is to reboot. I don't
reboot #2 --
just #1. Most of the time, it can connect again -- but sometimes it
takes
several
reboots. Then, it will lose it's connection again some time in the
future
(could be 15
minutes, 2 hours, 2 days, etc. -- always variable). I have disabled all
firewall and virus
software without any success. But, I don't suspect this to be the
problem
since #2 can
connect to #1 fine with virus protection/firewall enabled. Once it loses
its connection,
only a reboot of #1 will usually fix the problem. Through all of this,
both PC's can always
see and access the server resources without any problems. So, I don't
suspect that it's
a hardware issue (cables, etc.).

Could this be in relation to XP Pro's "10 concurrent connections"
feature
(even though
the single XP PC is the only one accessing it)? What else would cause
the
intermitant
network connectivity issues?

Thanks for any help.
Andy

Andy,

When you mention server access thru Network Places, this sounds like a
browser
issue.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html

Browser issues can be caused by many thing, and the most commonly noted
one here
is a firewall or other security setting. Please note that many personal
firewalls are known for not reacting properly when "disabled". Virus
programs,
also, may contain an antiworm product that can cause firewall type
problems.
The latter may not be disablable at all.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/your-personal-firewall-can-either-help.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/your-personal-firewall-can-either-help.html

When you talk about a random connectivity issue, the network card on
Computer
#1, and its power setting, is a possibility.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/does-your-computer-lose-network.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/does-your-computer-lose-network.html

Thanks for your response.

I don't think that it's a browser issue -- because both XP's can always
see
each other, they just can't connect resources to each other. I can refresh
the list of network PC's, and both PC's are always visible.

If the virus/firewall software was a problem -- wouldn't it *always* be a
problem? Because I can connect between the 2 XP PC's fine, but that
connection is lost after a variable amount of time.

I turned off the power features on the network card -- hopefully it makes
a
difference. But the host PC (#1) never loses network connectivity
(Internet,
server access, etc.) -- #2 just can't connect to #1's resources.

Thanks,
Andy

Hi Andy,

A browser conflict is amorphous. If you read my article, and the
Microsoft
white paper linked from it, you'll see that asymmetrical access /
visibility
problems, where a target might be visible but not accessible, are part of
a
browser conflict. And a browser conflict is the only networking glitch
that I
know of, short of the power management disconnection, or maybe a physical
equipment issue, that can come and go seemingly randomly.

The browser works well in a client-server domain environment, but not so
well in
a peer-peer workgroup. A segmented workgroup, with cached browse entries,
can
happen if your workgroup ever undergoes a master browser election with the
master browser separated, for any reason, from any other browser.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html

What type of networking hardware is involved here? Have you done any
graphical
analysis, maybe PingPlotter or equivalent, supporting your observations?
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/02/diagnosing-network-problems-using_11.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/02/diagnosing-network-problems-using_11.html

Hi Chuck,

Thanks for the additional information. After reading your article, I have
disabled the Browser service on my 2 client PC's. However, both of these do
log into a domain (the Win2K server that both can always access -- and which
always can access them). Your article stated that domains don't have so much
of a browser problem as peer-to-peer networks, so I'm not too sure how much
improvement there will be -- but I will let you know.

Some of the other suggestions pointed at a possible name resolution issue --
how would I check/fix this?

I have downloaded PingPlotter and will let you know the results.

Thanks,
Andy

Andy,

In a domain, you generally have servers (computers dedicated as servers), and
generally there will be 1 server for every 32 client computers. Servers
typically stay online constantly, so you have no browser problems.

You get browser problems when you have client computers running as a browser,
which is normal in a home or workgroup environment. Client computers are turned
off / disconnected / carried out of range of the network, etc. When a client
computer goes offline, the computers depending upon it have to get a new browser
relationship. That's where the problems start.

If your two computers only login to the domain when accessing other computers,
the domain browser infrastructure will take care of them. If your clients have
to function when away from the domain, too, we will have to deal with that.

Microsoft Windows computers have to function in so many different ways, and in
so many different configurations. It's no wonder that there are problems.

If you want to consider name resolution issues, start from my "Error = 53"
article.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/mysterious-error-53-aka-name-not-found.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/mysterious-error-53-aka-name-not-found.html

You never realise how complicated Windows Networking is, until you look at
browser, name resolution, and authentication issues, and see how easily each
type of problem can cause symptoms that appear as other problems.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/07/windows-networking.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/07/windows-networking.html

--
Cheers,
Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck mvps org.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cannot browse or open shared printers or server on sbs 2003 from client pc
    ... i think the network problem has taken a different turn. ... meanwhile if i access the mapped drives to the server which we setup in the ... my thought now is what is the update mechanism for the printers from the ... I understand the issue to be: client computers can ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: List of servers in this workgroup is currently not available.
    ... Computer description appears before the computer name in the My Network ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... <recently installed a D-Link print server with a reserved IP. ... <As soon as I uninstalled the print server and rebooted the computers, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Help with 070-217
    ... The network contains 25,000 computers. ... > single Windows 2000 domain named research.contoso.com. ... > Server computers that are configured as domain controllers. ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
  • RE: Help with 070-217
    ... The network contains 25,000 computers. ... > single Windows 2000 domain named research.contoso.com. ... > Server computers that are configured as domain controllers. ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
  • Help with 070-217
    ... The network contains 25,000 computers. ... single Windows 2000 domain named research.contoso.com. ... Server computers that are configured as domain controllers. ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)

Loading