Re: Network Hardware
- From: Chuck <none@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:38:51 -0800
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:06:46 GMT, "Troy" <Troy.Kranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uoef02ha4vebt8tm6jbntrvtuiap0pcqhk@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:43:49 GMT, "Troy" <Troy.Kranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:wrote:
"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0r0f02d6nn59e5nutb0er41a71spnc04uh@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:31:09 GMT, "Troy" <Troy.Kranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:psuc02pfvsg6fpv5isaje6ie90a985jt6i@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:55:21 GMT, "Troy" <Troy.Kranz@xxxxxxxxx>
Sharing
Hi!
I wrote the story below before I read PChuck's article "File
Sharing.On A
messageLAN With Two Routers" and now wonder whether or not to send this
ableas
File Sharing and Remote Connection are two tasks I still want to be
to
do after separating LAN into subnets, as well as maybe Print
and
I don't know if this is the correct forum for a question like this
SwitchMetresplease redirect me if you can.
I have a network operating between two houses that are about 900
apart. The setup is this:
PCs are all XP Pro.
(House1) PCs <--> Switch <--> AP (Point to Point) <--> Roof Antenna
((((( )))) (House2) Roof Antenna <--> AP (Point to Point)<-->
because<-->
onePCs and Internet(Router/Modem Combo). Currently all devices are the
LAN
(all addresses in the 192.168.0.x 255.255.255.0 subnet).
I was thinking that to keep the traffic off the APs (why? Just
aand
to learn stuff) I could create two subnets at each house and place
betweenRouter/Switch (I have two spares Vigor 2104P and Dlink DI-524)
house:wouldthe
Routerswitch and the AP at each house. I was also hoping to use the DLink
to limit the times that the kids could access the internet as they
subnet.have to go through the router to get to the internet on the other
In order to test this theory I have setup the following at my
Switch
PC1 <--> Router/Switch(DLink) <--> Router/Switch(Vigor) <-->
(I<-->
PC2-3 and Internet(Router/Modem Combo).
WAN Port on DLink Router connected to LAN Port1 on Vigor Router
PC1=192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 gateway = 192.168.3.1
DLink Router LAN = 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 WAN = 192.168.0.137
hopingjust
subnetpicked this ip randomly on the 2nd Subnet)
WAN Port on Vigor Router not yet connected
Vigor Router LAN = 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 WAN = not yet setup
PC2 = 192.168.0.11 255.255.255.0 Gateway=192.168.0.138
PC3 = 192.168.0.12 255.255.255.0 Gateway=192.168.0.138
Internet Router/Modem = 192.168.0.138
With this setup I can ping the 192.168.0.0 subnet from 192.168.3.0
but I can't access the internet(Can ping 192.168.0.138). I am
amthis
portis
because I have not yet set up the return leg of that journey(ie WAN
on
vigor to Lan port on DLink).
I have searched on the internet for a lot of information on what I
Lantrying
to do and what I have found tends to deal with routing a private
Ionto
the internet and not really about routing between private subnets.
butmay
have stumbled across sites that deal with what I am trying to do
Accesswithmaybe
it was at a level above my current understanding.
Anyway these are some of my question/s.
Q1. Am I on the right track with these ideas?
Q2. How do I connect the two routers together? eg. WAN to WAN port
crossover or WAN to LAN on both Routers
Q3. Should these routers do the job?
Q4. When I move to the original setup will I have to configure
nonPoints
on their own subnet?
Q5. Could this be done with less equipment?
Q6. I have heard the phrase 192.168.x.x addresses are private and
orroutable addresses. Does this mean that they should not be routed
defaultthat
defaultthey cannot be routed or is it another meaning all together?
Thanks in advance
Troy
Troy,
I see your problem, I think. On your main LAN, 192.168.0/24, the
gateway is 192.168.0.138. On your DLink LAN, 192.168.3/24, the
andDLinkgateway
is 192.168.3.1. Now, you need to define a default gateway for the
trafficto use,
on its WAN connection, to connect to the Internet.
Without a default gateway assigned to the DLink WAN, any Internet
from
PC1 goes to its default gateway 192.168.3.1, and to the DLink WAN,
be192.168.3.1,onto the
main LAN. And there it stays. The DLink WAN has to have a defaultgateway
defined, so the Internet traffic that it gets thru its LAN,
LAN,will go
thru 192.168.0.138. For the DLink, as for the computers on the main
working,the
default gateway will be 192.168.0.138.
Q1 / Q2. The routers are connected properly. When you get this
you'll
be moving all of your computers to the DLink LAN, and they will all
a192.168.0.138.able to
share files. Just set the default gateway for the DLink to
Q3. These routers should do the job.
Q4. Why do you wish to move to the original setup?
Q5. I'm not sure what you're accomplishing with the Vigor setup as
locatedswitch,
and connected to another switch. Are the Vigor and the switch
bein
the
same place, or are they separate?
Q6. The subnet 192.168.x.x is private (non-routable) so that it can
privately,behindused on
any private (non-routed) LAN in the world, without fear of beingduplicated by
any public LAN anywhere in the world. You can only use 192.168.x.x
a NAT
router. A NAT router handles the entire 192.168.x.x subnet
mainand
the
world sees only the WAN address. In your case, for instance, your
areLAN sees
192.168.0.137, and that address is translated by the DLink into the192.168.3.x
subnet.
Please let me know, at your earliest convenience, if these answers
thenunderstandable. It would be hella easier to setup your network,
group. Ito
responsesexplain
it.
Chuck
Thank you for your response. Just for your information some of my
may be 24 hours apart as I go home and try suggestions from this
house2.Routerscan't seem to find this newsgroup on my home computer for some reason.
Q1/Q2. The computers will remain as per the original setup but with
Probablyplaced in between the switches and APs.(Re: Q4 APs on own Subnet)
fastremove switch at house1 though. House2 has Gigabit switch and NICs for
file transfers at house2. The DLink already has the Gateway set to
192.168.0.138 but with no luck accessing the internet.
Q3. OK. Thanks.
Q4. See Q1/Q2.
Q5. House2 has Gigabit switch and NICs for fast file transfers at
twotogetherThe Switch and Router are separate in the test setup but would be
if I get this to work properly. In the current Test setup I have the
Ihowever IRouters and PC1 next to each other for ease of wiring them together.
Q6. What you have explained is basically as I remember NAT working
did not know that NAT would only work with the 192.168.x.x addresses.
Non-Routableexposedthough it would just translate any address to and from the one WAN
address. I can't say that I completely understand the term
saybut
I do think I understand how NAT works and the concept of how it limits
addresses used on the WAN. Would it more accurate to say that the
192.168.x.x subnet can't be used for Public Addresses rather then to
setupit
Itcan only be used for Private Addresses?
What's most accurate is to say that it ISN'T used for public addresses.
COULD be used, but by agreement (RFC 1918), no network provider will
privately,a
routing for you. Since it isn't used publicly, it can be used
DLinkin
safety, by anyone.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html
I have cabled the WAN port of the Vigor Router to a LAN Port of the
andRouter and set the Vigor WAN ip to 192.168.3.136 255.255.255.0 and no
Gateway. I can now ping all addresses on 192.168.0.x from 192.168.3.x
192.168.3.xvice-versa however I still get no Ineternet access from the
Makesubnet. Subnet 192.168.3.x PCs set with gateway 192.168.3.1 and Subnet
192.168.0.x PCs set with gateway 192.168.0.138.
Which router does PC1 connect to directly? The DLink or the Vigor?
Switchup
your mind please. You previously gave us:
PC1 <--> Router/Switch(DLink) <--> Router/Switch(Vigor) <-->
and<-->
Then, which router - the DLink or the Vigor, connects to the Switch,PC2-3 and Internet(Router/Modem Combo).
Gtwyby its
LAN or WAN port?
--
Cheers,
Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck mvps org.
Chuck
Sorry for the confusion.
The Setup is :
PC1 connected to DLink Router LAN Port1 (PC1 192.168.3.2/255.255.255.0
192.168.0.138)192.168.3.1)
DLink Router WAN Port Connected to Vigor Router LAN Port1 (DLink LAN
192.168.3.1/255.255.255.0 WAN 192.168.0.2/255.255.255.0 Gtwy
Gtwy
Vigor Router WAN Port Connected to DLink Router LAN Port1 (Vigor LAN
192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0 WAN 192.168.3.136/255.255.255.0 Gtwy <Blank>)
Vigor Router LAN2 Port Connected to Gigabit Switch Port1 (DLink DGS1005D)
PC2 Connected to Gigabit Switch Port2 (PC2 192.168.0.11/255.255.255.0
Gtwy192.168.0.138)
PC3 Connected to Gigabit Switch Port3 (PC3 192.168.0.13/255.255.255.0
(Speedstream192.168.0.138)
Speedstream 4200 Router/Modem Connected to Gigabit Switch Port4
DLink192.168.0.130/255.255.255.0)
Regards
Troy
Troy,
Try taking the Vigor out of the picture. Connect the DLink WAN to the
DGS1005D.
Where is 192.168.0.138? Should that be 192.168.0.130?
--
Cheers,
Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck mvps org.
Chuck
Sorry, you are correct 192.168.0.130 should have been 192.168.0.138. It is
the Speedstream 4200 Modem/Router that gives internet access.
I think I did already try the setup without the vigor Router and still could
not access the internet from the 192.168.3.x subnet. I will confirm that is
the case over the weekend.
Thank you for your help so far.
Regards
Troy
OK, Troy. We'll take it one step at a time. Let us know what you find out, and
I'll look thru your analysis again a few times while I wait.
--
Cheers,
Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck mvps org.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Troy
- Re: Network Hardware
- References:
- Network Hardware
- From: Troy
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Chuck
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Troy
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Chuck
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Troy
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Chuck
- Re: Network Hardware
- From: Troy
- Network Hardware
- Prev by Date: Re: Network Hardware
- Next by Date: Re: Access to server denied
- Previous by thread: Re: Network Hardware
- Next by thread: Re: Network Hardware
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|