Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- From: Chuck <none@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:54:19 -0800
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:44:06 -0800, "blackmon"
<blackmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Now, I'm just completely confused. My son emailed me and said what I need is
>a wireless access point. With that I can enable ICS on my desktop and my
>laptop, and my laptop can use my desktop's internet connection.
>I was looking at something call WiFlyer and another product called Nebo.
>What about these? I am lost here. Some of use are in the beginner stage.
You can use ICS, if you wish. But you're a lot better off using a NAT router.
ICS was a good solution a few years ago, but with the development of NAT routers
that will manage a dial-up modem, a NAT router is way better. Know the
disadvantages of ICS. And know how uninformed the Geek Squad is.
<http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/ics-is-ok-but-you-can-do-better.html>
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/ics-is-ok-but-you-can-do-better.html
I'm not familiar with either Nebo or WiFlyer - got URL?
--
Cheers,
Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck mvps org.
.
- References:
- dial-up and wireless networking
- From: blackmon
- Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- From: Kyuzo
- Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- From: Chuck
- Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- From: blackmon
- dial-up and wireless networking
- Prev by Date: Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- Next by Date: Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- Previous by thread: Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- Next by thread: Re: dial-up and wireless networking
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading