Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: "Kerry Brown" <kerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*a*m>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:46:15 -0800
Steve Winograd [MVP] wrote:
> In article <OzS9IrfGGHA.3936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kerry Brown"
> <kerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*a*m> wrote:
>> Descartes wrote:
>>>> Yes, ICS uses NAT.
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean by "static mapping"? What exactly do you want to
>>>> do? --
>>> Well I read somewhere, that a NAT creates a mapping of an intranet
>>> computers request out to the Internet. When a response arrives from
>>> the internet, the NAT looks in its mapping, to which intranet
>>> computer it should forward the response. This mapping is created
>>> dynamically and deleted when not needed anymore. The side effect of
>>> this is that the NAT actually works as a kind of fire wall
>>> neglecting all inbound traffic for which it does not have a
>>> mapping. This is all OK and does not require static mapping. But,
>>> if I would set up a server (on the intranet) to be accessible
>>> from the Internet, the NAT would need a static (persistent) mapping
>>> to know to which computer forward the requests coming from the
>>> Internet and addressed to the server.
>>> Please correct me if this doesn't make sens at all.
>>
>> Yes, ICS can do what you want. A stand alone router is a better idea
>> for a couple of reasons.
>
> I agree that a router is usually better than ICS, Kerry. But a router
> can't do the job if you're sharing a non-Ethernet Internet connection,
> like a dial-up modem or a USB cable modem.
>
>> 1) Using ICS the gateway computer is dirctly exposed to the Internet
>> on the public interface. A router will give all computers some level
>> of protection from malware. ICS will give all the other computers
>> this level of protection but the computer running ICS will still be
>> exposed.
>
> The ICS computer should be fine if it's running Windows Firewall.
> However, a router plus firewall gives two layers of protection.
>
Two layers is always better.
>> 2) The computer running ICS must be on for the other computers to
>> access the Internet. The computer running ICS will run slower
>> because of ICS. You may or may not notice this depending what else
>> the computer is used for.
>
> I can't imagine that ICS would have a noticeable effect. A typical
> broadband router has much less memory and a much slower processor than
> any computer that can run XP. For example, my SMC Barricade router
> has a 40 MHz CPU and less than 1MB of memory
>
I have seen otherwise respectable machines have a noticable slowdown,
especially when dialing, when a some winmodems are used with ICS. As you say
normally not a problem, but it can be noticable.
Kerry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Steve Winograd [MVP]
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Descartes
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- References:
- Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Descartes
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Steve Winograd [MVP]
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Descartes
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Kerry Brown
- Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- From: Steve Winograd [MVP]
- Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- Prev by Date: Re: Licence Key Windows XP, copy software to homenetwork pc's
- Next by Date: Re: WPA not a choice in WiFi Advanced
- Previous by thread: Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- Next by thread: Re: Does ICS or Firewall have a NAT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading