Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: "L..." <ofallons12320@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:40:56 -0500
"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bt1qf157dppajotgr0d4b0mad1t7m301df@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:19:58 -0500, "L." <ofallon12320@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:ppgnf1lt6ffu8tqg45ff39qncf5414raet@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:18:34 -0500, "L/P" <ofallon1232000@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"L/P" <ofallon1232000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>news:eFReGUqnFHA.3660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> "Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:qjqef1h3550bdncllp5pl5m25fq9fl4l34@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:14:54 -0500, "L." <ofallon12320@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >"L..." <ofallons12320@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> > >news:e29OTeqmFHA.3656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> "Chuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> > >> news:85p9f1hnhsjtoibkj7dvermkee28dmg51e@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> > >>> On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 10:15:19 -0500, "L."
>>>>> > >>> <ofallon12320@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>>(snip)
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>>Thanks for the info and have copied your "balanced" system.
>>>>> > >>>>>>We have two routers already so I need to make a decision on
>>>>> > >>>>>>what
>>>>> > >>>>>>I
>>>>> want
>>>>> > >>>>>>to
>>>>> > >>>>>>get.
>>>>> > >>>>>>I looked around the forum you suggested, man is that an
>>>>> > >>>>>>indepth
>>>>> forum!!
>>>>> > >>>>>>Still not sure what type of router I may need. Something
>>>>> > >>>>>>simple
>>>>but
>>>>> I
>>>>> > >>>>>>do
>>>>> > >>>>>>need the wireless for my one system plus my laptop.
>>>>> > >>>>>>Lewis
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> Lewis,
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> I personally have had good luck with Linksys. If you want a
>>>>simple
>>>>> > >>>>> reliable
>>>>> > >>>>> wired router for business use, ie with some future
>>>>> > >>>>> possibilities,
>>>>I
>>>>> > >>>>> suggest the
>>>>> > >>>>> Linksys BEFSX41. If you want to shave $$$ the Linksys BEFSR41
>>>>> > >>>>> is
>>>>> $30
>>>>> > >>>>> cheaper.
>>>>> > >>>>> You can spend way more money for a true small office router,
>>>>> > >>>>> but
>>>>the
>>>>> > >>>>> SX41
>>>>> > >>>>> is a
>>>>> > >>>>> good place to start. A wireless unit, comparable to the SX41,
>>>>would
>>>>> be
>>>>> > >>>>> the
>>>>> > >>>>> Linksys WRT54G.
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>
>>>><http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?childpagename=US%2FLayout&packedar
>>>>>
>>>>gs=c%3DL_Product_C2%26cid%3D1115416832406&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisito
>>>>> rWrapper>
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>
>>>><http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?childpagename=US%2FLayout&packedar
>>>>>
>>>>gs=c%3DL_Product_C2%26cid%3D1115416825557&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisito
>>>>> rWrapper>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>>Chuck,
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>Pretty sure the WRT54G wil do what I need.
>>>>> > >>>>Will pick it up today, Saturday, and will start reading later
>>>>> > >>>>today.
>>>>> Will
>>>>> > >>>>have to wait until first of week to install.
>>>>> > >>>>Wife decided to paint a couple of offices this week-end!!
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>Later,
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>L.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> L,
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Good idea. Paint and electronics are not things that are good
>>>>> > >>> to
>>>>mix.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Be sure to start with a secure WiFi LAN!
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>
>>>><http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/setting-up-wifi-lan-please-protect.ht
>>>>> ml>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> --
>>>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>>>> > >>> Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
>>>>> > >>> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> > >>> Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from
>>>>> experience.
>>>>> > >>> My email is AT DOT
>>>>> > >>> actual address pchuck mvps org.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> I've "played" with these systems enough that the wife said,
>>>>> > >> "we're
>>>>> > >> painting today", SO we're painting. :-)
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Have a great week-end,
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Lewis
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >Chuck,
>>>>> > > Good morning. Hope you had a good week-end.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >Comment and question- Brians IT friend worked on his system this
>>>>> week-end,,
>>>>> > >while we we're painting.
>>>>> > >He rearranged the wiring and hooked system to different routers.
>>>>> > >Not
>>>>sure
>>>>> > >exactly what he did but everything, including the wireless, is up
>>>>> > >and
>>>>> > >running ok.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >Question- I use Zone Alarm and two of my system are now showing an
>>>>> > >additional connection(lookback adapter).
>>>>> > >IOW-the only computer/network that been in the Firewall zone on all
>>>>three
>>>>> of
>>>>> > >my systems was/is:
>>>>> > >Name: New Network
>>>>> > >IP Address/site: (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0)
>>>>> > >Entry Type: Network
>>>>> > >Zone: Trusted
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >NOW, in addition to original "New Network" this is showing up on
>>>>> > >two
>>>>> > >systems.
>>>>> > >Name: Loopback adapter
>>>>> > >IP Address/Site: 127.0.0.1
>>>>> > >Entry Type: Ip Address
>>>>> > >Zone: Trusted
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >Plus I have a new icon in my bottom right system tray on the 98se
>>>>> wireless;
>>>>> > >two small tv screen that read, "Internet Gateway: connected".
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >Should I be concerned until I get my own router up and running OR
>>>>> > >is
>>>>this
>>>>> > >"normal" because of the new setup?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >L.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Lewis,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Every computer has a loopback adapter, it's a feature of IP routing.
>>>>> > I
>>>>> think
>>>>> > what you're seeing are UPnP discoverable devices. This is normal
>>>>because
>>>>> most
>>>>> > modern hardware is UPnP capable.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A few security experts will have you shut UPnP off. I'm not one
>>>>> > that
>>>>> agrees
>>>>> > with that; I think that a properly secured and monitored computer
>>>>> > can
>>>>run
>>>>> UPnP,
>>>>> > and have the Internet Gateway device available, in safety. UPnP
>>>>> > makes
>>>>it
>>>>> easier
>>>>> > for many convenience and communications programs to work properly.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Just keep your own computers clean and safe, and you'll be fine.
>>>
>>>>> Just now discovered another problem with my 98se wireless system. I
>>>>> can't
>>>>> get my e-mail, OE, to work.
>>>>> Keep getting the "standard" error msg.
>>>>>
>>>>> L.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Got it. Had to refigure NAV and Zone Alarm.
>>>
>>> Lewis,
>>>
>>> Is that NAV and ZA on the same computer? Is it JUST NAV? Or is NAV
>>> part
>>> of NIS
>>> / NPF?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
>>> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
>>> Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
>>> My email is AT DOT
>>> actual address pchuck mvps org.
>>
>>NAV 2005 as a lone program and ZA.
>>They are both on all 3 systems and seems to be working OK.
>>Turned off WINXP firewall and letting ZA do it's thing.
>>Everything "seems" to be working OK.
>>
>>L.
>
> That's great news! And BTW, how are you and Brian doing on your network?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking]
> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/
> Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience.
> My email is AT DOT
> actual address pchuck mvps org.
Thanks for asking. We're still running as before.
I hooked up a seperate router but having problems. The interent connection
slowed WAY down.
Put it back like it was and haven't had a chance to work on it. Not sure
what we're/I'm doing wrong?
All I did was disconnect my two wire connections (one is wireless) and
hooked into "my" router. My systems can see each other and I can swap files,
etc. but the net connection is SLOW...
I was going to ask for assistance first of next week, if it slows down and
try some different settings, etc..
Anything I might try or read up on?
L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: Chuck
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- References:
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L.
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: Chuck
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L.
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: Chuck
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L...
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L.
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: Chuck
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L/P
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L/P
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: Chuck
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: L.
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- From: Chuck
- Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- Prev by Date: Multiple IPSEC clients/vendors on one winxp PC
- Next by Date: How do I disable internet access without loosing other connectivity.
- Previous by thread: Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- Next by thread: Re: Seperating LAN and systems??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|